Creativity, paradigms and morphological constructions
Evidence from Dutch pseudoparticiples
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5043622 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Muriel Norde (0000-0003-4944-8810, 240387 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Nordeuropa-Institut , Berlin , Germany), Graeme Trousdale (0000-0002-4148-166X, Linguistics & English Language, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , Scotland, UK) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-09-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Editorial | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling-2023-0194 |
| OpenAlex | W4402650272 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 39 |
Pseudoparticiples follow phonotactic, morphological, and syntactic rules for regular participles, but they are special in that they lack corresponding verbal forms. This article offers a constructionist account of two types of pseudoparticiples in Dutch, i.e., those with a nominal base and the prefix ont- or be-, e.g., ontkoeid 'de-cowed' or bedauwd 'bedewed'. Their properties raise interesting questions regarding the nature of morphological creativity, back-formation, and the establishment of new schemas or paradigms. Using data from the nlTenTen14 corpus, we consider constraints on the formation of verbal paradigms from such pseudoparticiples, and what this tells us about the nature of morphological creativity. Our corpus data suggest substantial differences between be- and ont-pseudoparticiples in terms of frequency distributions, productivity, and syntactic behavior. Drawing on concepts from cognitive linguistics generally and Construction Morphology in particular, this article addresses the usefulness of the distinction between full and partial sanction as a means to explain the variation (i) within the pseudoparticiple sets and (ii) between regular and pseudoparticiples. We also suggest some revisions to the notions of E- and F-creativity to account for differences between the be- and ont- sets
Creativity · Linguistics · Sociology · Theoretical linguistics · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Constructions at Work
Lexicalization and Language Change
The Dynamics of the Linguistic System
The Grammar Network
Parts and wholes
Corpus linguistics in morphology
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
Creative intentions — The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’
Creativity within and outside the linguistic system
Speakers are creative, within limits — a response to Peter Uhrig
Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax
Lexical expansion in the Have and BE perfect in Dutch
The Sketch Engine
Schemas and the frequency/acceptability mismatch
Construction Morphology
Radical Construction Grammar
Why is grammaticalization irreversible
Coercion
Productivity and English derivation
On ambiguous past participles in Dutch
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |