Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Mapping the Cosmopolitan Legal Imaginary

Recent Chinese Scholarship on Dispute Resolution

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5073798
AutoresMatthew S Erie (0000-0002-0422-3338, University of Oxford, autor de correspondencia)
Año2022
Volumen70
Número1
Páginas210-221
Fecha de publicación2022-10-25
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe American Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-919X • E-ISSN: 2326-9197
EditorialOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ajcl/avac027
OpenAlexW4295821997
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1

In recent years, China has led a not-so-silent revolution in internationalizing its dispute resolution mechanisms, including its courts, arbitration commissions, and mediation bodies, in order to facilitate cross-border investment and trade. These advancements are startling, considering that, merely fifty years ago, China suffered from a kind of legal nihilism. As late as the 1970s, people’s courts in China were either dismantled or hyper-politicized in the face of the Cultural Revolution. In light of China’s legal history, in the past, states and firms conducting business with Chinese entities relied on primarily Anglo-American institutions (e.g., the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Body, the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, the London Court of International Arbitration, the New York and Delaware courts, etc.). However, the Chinese government has made it a priority to onshore disputes involving Chinese state agencies, state-owned enterprises, and private companies. These new Chinese mechanisms for resolving commercial and investment disputes include the much-discussed China International Commercial Court (CICC), “special courts” in Shenzhen and Shanghai, and “international” arbitration commissions that administer commercial and investor-state dispute settlement. Less publicized have been the gradual reforms to the people’s courts, which include more judicial training in foreign law and conflict of laws. Rounding out the picture, China has championed the Singapore Mediation Convention, as business mediation has become a mainstay across a number of Chinese industrial and service sectors. These developments are notable given that in China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the source of a higher-level normative order than state law, and because the CCP is imbricated with formal dispute resolution institutions, China’s normative pluralism is globalizing along with these institutions.1 All of this raises the question: Are Shenzhen and Xi’an the new Delaware and London?

Alternative dispute resolution · Arbitration · China · Dispute mechanism · Dispute resolution · Mediation · Political science · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Corporate Law and Human Rights · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law

  • Flexible sovereignty and contested legality

    Open Access•Ding Fei•Environment and Planning D…•2025

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae