When The Urban Fringe is Not Suburban

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5113535
AutoresJason Jindrich (Postdoctoral research associate at the Initiative in Spatial Structures in the Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912., autor de correspondencia)
Año2010
Volumen100
Número1
Páginas35-55
Fecha de publicación2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGeographical Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0016-7428 • E-ISSN: 1931-0846
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010.00005.x
OpenAlexW2026999701
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas16

Research on the history of suburbs tends to either disregard the fringe of urban development or locate it beyond the city limits. In this article I argue that compounding fringe and suburban development misrepresents the real differences between the two. I then examine the metropolitan regions of three major U.S. cities‐Baltimore, Buffalo, and Saint Louis in 1880 for evidence of how they differed. A consistent difference emerged between the residents of the suburban districts of a city and those of the presumed location of the fringe.KeywordsBaltimoreBuffaloSaint Louissuburbsurban fringe * I would like to acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Colten, his staff, and several reviewers whose comments and assistance were incredibly helpful.* I would like to acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Colten, his staff, and several reviewers whose comments and assistance were incredibly helpful.Notes* I would like to acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Colten, his staff, and several reviewers whose comments and assistance were incredibly helpful

Archaeology · Art history · Geography · Metropolitan area · SAINT · Sociology · Financial Crisis of the 21st Century · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History