Popular religions and multiple modernities
A Theoretical Framework for a Research Agenda
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5141285 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Cristián P Parker (0000-0001-8041-9642, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, autor de correspondencia), Cristián Parker |
| Año | 2016 |
| Volumen | 18 |
| Número | 25 |
| Páginas | 38-57 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2016-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ciencias Sociales y Religión (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1518-4463 • E-ISSN: 1982-2650 |
| Editorial | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (PUBLISHER • BR) |
| DOI | 10.22456/1982-2650.69247 |
| OpenAlex | W2586689601 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
Religious diversity and pluralism is increasing in Latin America. The religious field that was some decades ago totally Catholic has changed radically. Not only Pentecostalism or NeoPentecostalism but other Evangelicals as well as independent churches of various denominations and forms, non-affiliated people and many diverse (ethnic, afro-American , New Age, etc.) and diffuse religious expressions are growing. The main argument of this paper is that this religious changes toward pluralism can be fully understood in the context of multiple modernities theory, provided that it be revised and modified. A new sociological approach is needed. The classical sociological concepts and theories, beginning with secularization, must be criticized and replaced with a more complex theoretical view. Latin American historical processes must be compared with what is happening in other regions of the world and not only with the West. World religions are answering each one by their own path to multiple interactions with modernities. The key understanding of changes must come from a better insight of popular religions worldwide. Latin American, Eastern Asia, Islam regions, are good examples of popular forms of religious revitalization that contrasts with the Northern European case. They put in evidence the fact that new ways of producing sense and spiritual search in non-Western geo-cultural areas are framing specific relationships between religion and modernities and bringing about new religious pluralisms
Argument (complex analysis · Comparative religion · Epistemology · Framing (construction · Hinduism · Islam · Latin Americans · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Religious pluralism · Secularization · Social science · Sociology · Theology · Anthropology · Gender Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society in Latin America · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religious studies
Chinese Popular Religion
I s E urope an E xceptional C ase ?
Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities
Latin America and the Problem of Multiple Modernities
The Oxford Handbook of Religious Diversity
Spiritual, but not Religious
The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Religion
Official and Popular Religion
Au croisement de l’identité et de la différence
Interculturality, Conflicts and Religion
What do Argentine people believe in? Religion and social structure in Argentina
Religion and the Awakening of Indigenous People in Latin America
Tribes and Cities
Multiple modernities and mass communications in Muslim countries
The Reconstruction of Religious Arenas in the Framework of `Multiple Modernities
On Being Religious
Modernidades múltiples y encuentro de civilizaciones
América Latina ya no es católica? Pluralismo cultural y religioso creciente
Multiple modernities, modern subjectivities and social order
Religious Pluralism and New Political Identities in Latin America
The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations
Beyond Christianity
Secularization on Trial
Modern Popular Religion
Ethnocentrism, Social Theory and Non-Western Sociologies of Religion
Popular and lived religions
Multiple Modernities or Varieties of Modernity
Multiple Modernities
Religious Studies in Latin America
Reading and Misreading Habits of the Heart
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |