Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Accuracy of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) for diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder according to DSM-IV criteria

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5176409
AutoresMaria Inês Quintana (0000-0002-3808-8189, Universidade Federal de São Paulo), Jair De Jesus Mari (0000-0003-2205-7799), Jair Jesus Mari (0000-0002-5403-0112, Universidade Federal de São Paulo), W S Ribeiro (0000-0001-6735-3861, Universidade Federal de São Paulo), Miguel Roberto Jorge (Universidade Federal de São Paulo), Miguel Jorge (0000-0003-3009-4725, Universidade Federal de São Paulo), Sergio Baxter Andreoli (0000-0002-1976-0881, Universidade Federal de São Paulo)
Año2012
Volumen28
Número7
Páginas1312-1318
Fecha de publicación2012-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCadernos de Saude Publica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0102-311X • E-ISSN: 1678-4464
EditorialFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/s0102-311x2012000700009
PMID22729261
OpenAlexW2149529930
SCIELO_PIDS0102-311X2012000700009
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas26

The objective was to study the accuracy of the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) DSM-IV diagnosis, using the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) as gold standard, and compare the ICD-10 and DSM IV classifications for PTSD. The CIDI was applied by trained lay interviewers and the SCID by a psychologist. The subjects were selected from a community and an outpatient program. A total of 67 subjects completed both assessments. Kappa coefficients for the ICD-10 and the DSM IV compared to the SCID diagnosis were 0.67 and 0.46 respectively. Validity for the DSM IV diagnosis was: sensitivity (51.5%), specificity (94.1%), positive predictive value (9.5%), negative predictive value (66.7%), misclassification rate (26.9%). The CIDI 2.1 demonstrated low validity coefficients for the diagnosis of PTSD using DSM IV criteria when compared to the SCID. The main source of discordance in this study was found to be the high probability of false-negative cases with regards to distress and impairment as well as to avoidance symptoms

Anxiety · Anxiety disorder · CIDI · Cohen's kappa · Distress · DSM-5 · Gold standard (test) · Kappa · Positive predicative value · Predictive validity · Predictive value · Psychiatry · Statistics · Traumatic stress · Clinical Psychology · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research · Psychology

  • Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)

    Open Access•Hans-Ulrich Wittchen•Journal of Psychiatric Research•1994

  • Lifetime Events and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in 4 Postconflict Settings

    Joop De Jong, Joop T V M De Jong•JAMA•2001

  • Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the Community

    Naomi Breslau, R C Kessler et al.•Archives of General Psychiatry•1998

  • The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview

    Open Access•Gavin Andrews, Lorna Peters•Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric…•1998

  • The Use of Confidence or Fiducial Limits Illustrated in the Case of the Binomial

    C J CLOPPER, E S PEARSON•Biometrika•1934

  • The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID)

    Robert L Spitzer•Archives of General Psychiatry•1992

  • Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Naomi Breslau•Journal of Urban Health•2004

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae