Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Anti Anticonstructivism or Laying the Fears of a Langdon Winner to Rest

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5186554
AutoresMark Elam (0000-0002-4813-9584, Linköping University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1994
Volumen19
Número1
Páginas101-106
Fecha de publicación1994-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/016224399401900107
OpenAlexW2070691244
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas6

In recent paper, Langdon Winner (1993) characterizes new sociology of technology as an intellectual tragedy. Assuming high moral ground, he accuses everyone linked with of being, among other things, elitist, implicitly conservative, blase, and politically naive. Winner appears to be declaring war on something despicable and asking each of us to make our loyalties known: are you one of us or one of them? Although accepting that important differences exist among leading practitioners of social constructivism and that some of writers he mentions might actually object to being classified as constructivists, Winner maintains that basic disposition and viewpoint of constructivist remains fairly consistent (p. 366) and that beyond dispute there has been a concerted push to affirm social constructivism as coherent mode of analysis and to include or exclude writers according to their degree of adherence to new canonical standard (p. 377). After being confronted with Winner's call to arms against heinous constructivism, it is relief to have some characteristically wise and instructive words from Clifford Geertz. According to Geertz, a scholar can hardly be better employed than in destroying (1984,263). The fear and loathing Winner expresses toward social constructivism strongly resembles harmful pattern of intellectual dread that Geertz identifies under rubric antirelativism. Winner wishes to whip up something like anticonstructivism. I feel no particular inclination to defend an extremely amorphous research program that, for want of better name, can be labeled the social construction of technology; and yet, I do feel compelled to condemn

Epistemology · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Infrastructure and the Form of Politics

    Open Access•Darin Barney•Canadian Journal of Communication•2021

  • On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology

    Open Access•Keith Grint, Steve Woolgar•Science Technology & Human Values•1995

  • The Womb as Operation Room

    Open Access•Hans Harbers•Science Technology & Human Values•2003

  • Shifting Sexes, Moving Stories

    Open Access•Stefan Hirschauer, A Mol•Science Technology & Human Values•1995

  • The Turn to Technology in Social Studies of Science

    Open Access•Steve Woolgar•Science Technology & Human Values•1991

  • Computers and the Transformation of Social Analysis

    Open Access•Steve Woolgar, Keith Grint•Science Technology & Human Values•1991

  • Computers, Guns, and Roses

    Open Access•Keith Grint, Steve Woolgar•Science Technology & Human Values•1992

  • Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty

    Open Access•Langdon Winner•Science Technology & Human Values•1993

  • Distinguished Lecture

    Open Access•Clifford Geertz•American Anthropologist•1984

Obras citantes distintas4
Citas por año0,13
Intervalo de citas1995 - 2021 (27)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae