Flush and Bone

Funeralizing Alkaline Hydrolysis in the United States

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5337520
AutoresPhilip R Olson (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen39
Número5
Páginas666-693
Fecha de publicación2014-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243914530475
OpenAlexW2079035985
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas12
Referencias citadas11

This article examines the political controversy in the United States surrounding a new process for the disposition of human remains, alkaline hydrolysis (AH). AH technologies use a heated (sometimes pressurized) solution of water and strong alkali to dissolve tissues, yielding an effluent that can be disposed through municipal sewer systems, and brittle bone matter that can be dried, crushed, and returned to the decedent's family. Though AH is legal in eight US states, opposition to the technology remains strong. Opponents express concerns about public health and safety and about the dignity of our mortal remains. Proponents focus on AH's environmental benefits over cremation and earth burial, aligning the technology with the "green burial" movement. Drawing from historical sources, Science, Technology, and Society literature, interviews with funeral professionals, industry literature, and various media sources, this article examines four prominent conceptions of the dead human body as they are deployed (and inflected) by various funeral stakeholders seeking to exercise authority over the dead human body, to influence the trajectory of AH technology in the United States, and to chart a course for US deathcare culture in the twenty-first century

Dignity · Environmental ethics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law