Mapping Superpositionality in Global Ethnography
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5337650 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Logan D A Williams (0000-0002-3964-2356, Michigan State University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 198-223 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243917711005 |
| OpenAlex | W2620536086 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 42 |
Science studies scholars often study up to high-tech elites who produce and design scientific knowledge and technology. Methodological tension begins when you pair a desire to study down to less economically developed countries, with the desire to study up to high-tech elites within them. This becomes further complicated when the ethnographer and his/her informants share professional interests and credentials. In these situations, the researcher has high status because of geopolitical privilege. However, the researcher is neither a high-tech elite nor a local cultural elite. How might the ethnographer successfully access and navigate field sites imbued with these unseen power differentials? There are currently no visual mapping tools to enhance the process of reflexivity by feminist ethnographers, as they consider their globally embedded multiple, hierarchical, and situated positionality. This reflection methodology piece provides a tool to consider this phenomenon, as it exists across the Global North/South divide of power. Such a tool would be useful to northern ethnographers to better strategize ethics and access while avoiding complicity with structures of inequality and empowering their southern interlocutors
Autoethnography · Complicity · Elite · Epistemology · Ethnography · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Reflexivity · Situated · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Gender Studies · Law · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Science and Policy Research
The Extended Case Method
Situational Analysis
Reinventing anthropology.
Ethnography in/of the World System
Resisting the Veil of Privilege
Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex
Studying Down, Up, Sideways, Through, Backwards, Forwards, Away and at Home
Global ethnography
Unequal ‘Partners’. Aids, Academia, and the Rise of Global Health
Getting Undone Technology Done
An Ontology for the Ethnographic Analysis of Social Processes
Ethnographers of the WorldUnited? Current Debates on the Ethnographic Study of Globalization
Ties between Center and Periphery in the Scientific World-System
Getting Connected
What difference does difference make
Scientized politics and global governance in the cotton trade
The continuum of complicity
Positionality and Power
The Sociology of Science
Multi-sited Ethnography as a Middle Range Methodology for Contemporary STS
International Collaboration in Multilayered Center-Periphery in the Globalization of Science and Technology
Sociotechnical Practices and Difference
Status Crystallization
Feminist Politics and Fetal Surgery
What Difference Does Difference Make? Position and Privilege in the Field
Dilemmas of Development Discourse
Advocacy after Bhopal
The Sociological Eye
I Know Him So Well
Ethics and Politics of Studying Up in Technoscience
Now I see it, now I don't
A 'balikbayan' in the field
Dynamics of the 'field
Studying power
Talking Back to Sociology
Anthropological Superheroes and the Consequences of Activist Ethnography
The Extended Case Method
Insiders and Outsiders
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,43 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2024 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |