Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Maximizing the Policy Impacts of Public Engagement

A European Study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5337677
AutoresSteven B Emery (Newcastle University), Henk A J Mulder (Science and Society Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands), Henk Mulder (0000-0003-4739-2665, University of Groningen), Lynn J Frewer (0000-0002-6494-3492, Newcastle University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2015
Volumen40
Número3
Páginas421-444
Fecha de publicación2015-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243914550319
OpenAlexW2136950867
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas25
Referencias citadas23

There is a lack of published evidence which demonstrates the impacts of public engagement (PE) in science and technology policy. This might represent the failure of PE to achieve policy impacts or indicate a lack of effective procedures for discerning the uptake by policy makers of PE-derived outputs. While efforts have been made to identify and categorize different types of policy impact, research has rarely attempted to link policy impact with PE procedures, political procedures, or the connections between them. In this article, we propose a simple conceptual model to capture this information, based on semistructured interviews with both policy makers and PE practitioners. A range of criteria are identified to increase the policy impact of PE. The role of PE practitioners in realizing impacts through their interactions with policy makers in the informal "in-between" spaces of public engagement is emphasized. However, the potential contradictions between the pursuit of policy impacts and the more traditional conceptualizations of PE effectiveness are discussed. The main barrier to the identification of policy impacts from PE may lie within policy processes themselves. Political institutions have responsibility to establish formalized procedures for monitoring the uptake and use of evidence from PE in their decision-making processes

Business · Categorization · Economics · Impact assessment · Management science · Policy analysis · Policy studies · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public engagement · Public involvement · Public policy · Public relations · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Administration · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Participation or involvement? Development of forest strategies on national and sub-national level in Germany

    Open Access•Norbert Weber•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • A theory of participation

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Mark S Reed et al.•Restoration Ecology•2018

  • STS boundary spanners

    Open Access•David Tomblin, Jen Schneider et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2026

  • Best bang for your buck

    Open Access•Denis B Karcher, Christopher Cvitanovic et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Designing Participatory Technology Assessments

    Open Access•Leah R Kaplan, Mahmud Farooque et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2019

    Francesco Luzzini•Isis•2019

  • Interests and Influence

    Open Access•Pedro Ivo Sebba Ramalho, Delia Rodrigo•Open Journal of Political Science•2022

  • Whose input counts? Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization

    Ashlee Jollymore, K B Mcfarlane et al.•Critical Policy Studies•2017

  • Juggling Roles, Experiencing Dilemmas

    Open Access•Jantien W Schuijer, Jacqueline E W Broerse et al.•NanoEthics•2021

  • Navigating tensions in inclusive conservation

    Open Access•Ciska Ulug, Miguel Á Cebrián-Piqueras et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2023

  • Gestión de la comunicación científica de los proyectos de investigación en H2020. Funciones, modelos y estrategias

    Open Access•Manuel Gértrudix Barrio, Mario Rajas Fernández et al.•El Profesional de la Informacion•2020

  • Summary of the ONE Society track > opportunities and challenges

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Lynn Frewer et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2023

  • Engaging informality

    Evan M Mistur, Ariadna Reyes et al.•Local Environment•2026

  • Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology

    Open Access•Lotte Krabbenborg, Henk A J Mulder et al.•Science Communication•2015

  • Responsible innovation through conscious contestation at the interface of agricultural science, policy, and civil society

    Open Access•Laxmi Prasad Pant•Agriculture and Human Values•2019

  • Socio-economic status and authority deference

    Open Access•Lucilla Losi•Public Understanding of Science•2026

  • Science to the rescue or contingent progress? Comparing 10 years of public, expert and policy discourses on new and emerging science and technology in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Melanie Smallman•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • From engaging publics to engaging knowledges

    Open Access•Melanie Goisauf, Anna Durnová•Public Understanding of Science•2019

  • There is nothing nano-specific here’

    Open Access•Anouk Heltzel, Jantien W Schuijer et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2022

  • Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance

    Open Access•Niklas Gudowsky, Walter Peissl•European Journal of Futures…•2016

  • A literature review on the relationship between risk governance and public engagement in relation to complex environmental issues

    R G van der Vegt•Journal of Risk Research•2018

  • Perception et émergence d’une Boutique des sciences dans la région des Hauts-de-France

    Open Access•Bénédicte Lefebvre, Annunziata Savoia et al.•Natures Sciences Sociétés•2019

  • Perceptions of public land governance from two Canadian provinces

    Open Access•Lauren F Miller, Lauren Miller et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • How universities study the future

    Open Access•Reza Hafezi, Sara Ghaboulian Zare et al.•Futures•2024

  • The dark side of public participation

    Open Access•Nancy Bouchard•Canadian Public Administration•2016

  • Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research

    Open Access•Jeremy Phillipson, Philip Lowe et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2012

  • Stakeholder participation for environmental management

    Open Access•Mark S Reed•Biological Conservation•2008

  • Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics

    Nick Pidgeon, Nick F Pidgeon et al.•Health Risk & Society•2007

  • Participatory Paradoxes

    Open Access•Maria C Powell, Maria Powell et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2009

  • Bridges between Science, Society and Policy

    Open Access•D Bütschi, Katharina Mader et al.•Bridges Between Science, Society…•2004

  • Public engagement to build trust

    Judith Petts•Journal of Risk Research•2008

  • Survey Article

    Open Access•Archon Fung•Journal of Political Philosophy•2003

  • Lost in Translation? The Need for ‘Upstream Engagement’ with Nanotechnology on Trial

    Pierre-Benoit Joly, Pierre‐benoit Joly et al.•Science as Culture•2008

  • The quality of food risk management in Europe

    Open Access•Julie Houghton, J R Houghton et al.•Food Policy•2007

  • Participatory processes for designing environmental policies

    Open Access•Ortwin Renn•Land Use Policy•2006

  • Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology

    Open Access•Monika Kurath, Priska Gisler•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  • Public Participation Methods

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2000

  • Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2004

  • A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2005

  • Deliberating Competence

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers•Science Technology & Human Values•2008

  • Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy

    Open Access•Lisa M Pytlikzillig, Alan J Tomkins•Review of Policy Research•2011

Obras citantes distintas25
Citas por año2,27
Intervalo de citas2015 - 2026 (12)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 24
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae