Precarious Plasticity

Neuropolitics, Cochlear Implants, and the Redefinition of Deafness

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5338165
AutoresLaura Mauldin (0000-0002-2113-912X, Human Development/Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen39
Número1
Páginas130-153
Fecha de publicación2014-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243913512538
OpenAlexW2072174109
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas20
Referencias citadas33

This article provides an ethnographic account of pediatric cochlear implantation, revealing an important shift in the definition of deafness from a sensory loss to a neurological processing problem. In clinical and long-term therapeutic practices involved in pediatric implantation, the cochlear implant (CI) is recast as a device that merely provides access to the brain. The "real" treatment emerges as long-term therapeutic endeavors focused on neurological training. This redefinition then ushers in an ensuing responsibility to "train the brain," subsequently displacing failure from the device onto the individual's ability to train his or her brain (in pediatric implantation, this most often falls onto the mother). New caregiving techniques that accompany implantation are understood through neuropolitics, showing how parents are encouraged to engage in neuro-self-governance, and how the concept of neuroplasticity is used to cultural ends

Cochlear implantation · Children's Rights and Participation · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations