Ab hostibus captus et a latronibus captus

The Impact of the Roman Model of Citizenship on Rabbinic Law

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5348366
AutoresOrit Malka (0000-0002-3097-3714), Yakir Paz (0000-0001-8641-2839)
Año2019
Volumen109
Número2
Páginas141-172
Fecha de publicación2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Jewish Quarterly Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0021-6682 • E-ISSN: 1553-0604
EditorialProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/jqr.2019.0009
OpenAlexW2946371755
IdiomaCA
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas17

In tKet 4.5 a rare distinction between types of captives is introduced, bearing dramatic consequences: a husband must ransom his wife if she is a "captive of banditry" but not if she is a "captive of a kingdom." In addition, the Tosefta rules that if divorced, the ransomed wife is entitled only to a ketubah of 100 dinars, and not of 200 dinars as expected by the standard halakhah. Despite previous scholarly efforts, the rationale for the distinction and its unique legal implications remains unclear. In this essay, we offer a solution based on the Roman law of captivity. We argue that this distinction is adopted from the Roman law that distinguishes between captors based on the degree of their political legitimization. Furthermore, the reduced monetary obligations of the husband in the Tosefta should be understood in light of the legal consequences of captivity on a citizen which, according to Roman law, entail suspension or dissolution of all the citizen's legal bonds, including marriage. Beyond solving local problems, the essay points to a profound impact of the Roman model of citizenship on tannaitic halakhah. According to the common opinion, external circumstances cannot impact the status of a Jew vis-à-vis the halakhah. In contradistinction, the Tosefta follows the Roman model that views the applicability of the law as a matter of citizenship, which may be lost

Captivity · Citizenship · Gentry · Political science · Politics · Ransom · Sociology · Wife · Ancient Near East History · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · History · Law · Philosophy