Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Preparation, Participation and Impact (PPI)

The best-practice principles of Place-Based Approaches (PBAs)

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5658012
AutoresTanya Rong (0000-0001-6809-9842, Monash Health, autor de correspondencia), Eli Ristevski (0000-0001-6559-8398, Monash Health), Matthew Carroll (0000-0002-6396-8364, Monash Health)
Año2025
Volumen388
Páginas118703
Fecha de publicación2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118703
PMID41172619
OpenAlexW4415459688
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas43

Place-based approaches (PBAs) are becoming increasingly popular across government, public health research and practice to improve health and wellbeing in areas of poor health and disadvantage. As a relatively new approach, the literature on best practice for PBAs is emergent, and delivery methods are often diverse. We explored the essential key principles and considerations for best practice, with the aim of developing a framework for PBAs. Using Grounded Theory methodology, 23 interviews were conducted with participants from Australia, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. Purposive sampling was used to recruit community members, policymakers and funders, program officers, Aboriginal leaders and researchers. The data was analysed thematically. We identified three key principles of PBAs: Preparation, Participation and Impact (PPI) which are critical at all stages to reach the key outcomes of: 1. Understanding People and Place; 2. Connecting with Community; and 3. Shifting the System. At all times, the need to ensure that power is balanced is critical to fostering an inclusive engagement process. By following the principles outlined in this evidence-based framework, communities, funders and those involved in developing and delivering place-based programs can work together to address complex problems in a way that values the lived experience of community members and optimises the chances of achieving long-term health improvement

Best practice · Community engagement · Grounded theory · Key (lock) · Nonprobability sampling · Power (physics) · Program evaluation · Public health · Work (physics) · Community Health and Development · Outdoor and Experiential Education · Service-Learning and Community Engagement

  • Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations

    Open Access•Sandra Moll, Michelle Wyndham-West et al.•BMJ Open•2020

  • Reaching the hard-to-reach

    Open Access•Billie Bonevski, Madeleine Randell et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2014

  • Grounded theory research

    Open Access•Ylona Chun Tie, Melanie Birks et al.•SAGE Open Medicine•2019

  • Achieving successful community engagement

    Open Access•Esther De Weger, Natascha Van Vooren et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2018

  • Community-based participatory research to engage disadvantaged communities

    Open Access•Maria Teresa Riccardi, Valentina Pettinicchio et al.•Health Policy•2023

  • Grounded Theory

    Melanie Birks, Jane Mills•QMiP Bulletin•2024

  • Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations

    Open Access•Gillian Mulvale, Sandra Moll et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co‐design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health‐care teams

    Open Access•Kirsten Siig Pallesen, Lisa Rogers et al.•Health Expectations•2020

  • Mitigating unintended consequences of co‐design in health care

    Open Access•Éidín Ní Shé, Reema Harrison•Health Expectations•2021

  • Boundary work

    Open Access•J Reynolds•Critical Public Health•2017

  • Putting context centre stage

    Open Access•Lois Orton, Emma Halliday et al.•Critical Public Health•2016

  • Exploring community engagement in place-based approaches in areas of poor health and disadvantage

    Open Access•Tanya Rong, Eli Ristevski et al.•Health & Place•2023

  • Health Action Zones

    Open Access•Martin Powell, Graham Moon•Health & Social Care in the…•2001

  • Whose place is it anyway? Representational politics in a place-based health initiative

    Open Access•Carole Rushton•Health & Place•2013

  • Delivering Public Services

    Open Access•Ian Marsh, Kate Crowley et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2016

  • From medical to health geography

    Open Access•Robin Kearns, Graham Moon•Progress in Human Geography•2002

  • Assessing the Effect of Area Based Initiatives on Local Area Outcomes

    Open Access•John Rhodes, Pamela Tyler et al.•Urban Studies•2005

  • People first

    Mary Ellen Brown, Birgitta L Baker•Community Development•2019

  • Member Checking

    Open Access•Linda Birt, Suzanne Scott et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

  • Influencing health policy through public deliberation

    Open Access•Chris Degeling, Lucie Rychetnik et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • Scaling up

    Open Access•Clare Bambra, Katherine E Smith et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Understanding and representing 'place' in health research

    Open Access•Steven Cummin, Steven Curti et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2007

  • Complexity and Uncertainty in Geography of Health Research

    Jamie R Pearce•Annals of the American…•2018

  • The Perception of the Environment

    T Ingold•The Perception of the Environment•2002

  • Emerging spheres of engagement

    Open Access•J Palmer, Lorelle J Burton et al.•Qualitative Research•2020

  • Capturing complexity in the evaluation of a major area-based initiative in community empowerment

    Lois Orton, Ruth Ponsford et al.•Anthropology and Medicine•2019

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae