Preparation, Participation and Impact (PPI)
The best-practice principles of Place-Based Approaches (PBAs)
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5658012 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tanya Rong (0000-0001-6809-9842, Monash Health, autor de correspondencia), Eli Ristevski (0000-0001-6559-8398, Monash Health), Matthew Carroll (0000-0002-6396-8364, Monash Health) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 388 |
| Páginas | 118703 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118703 |
| PMID | 41172619 |
| OpenAlex | W4415459688 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 43 |
Place-based approaches (PBAs) are becoming increasingly popular across government, public health research and practice to improve health and wellbeing in areas of poor health and disadvantage. As a relatively new approach, the literature on best practice for PBAs is emergent, and delivery methods are often diverse. We explored the essential key principles and considerations for best practice, with the aim of developing a framework for PBAs. Using Grounded Theory methodology, 23 interviews were conducted with participants from Australia, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. Purposive sampling was used to recruit community members, policymakers and funders, program officers, Aboriginal leaders and researchers. The data was analysed thematically. We identified three key principles of PBAs: Preparation, Participation and Impact (PPI) which are critical at all stages to reach the key outcomes of: 1. Understanding People and Place; 2. Connecting with Community; and 3. Shifting the System. At all times, the need to ensure that power is balanced is critical to fostering an inclusive engagement process. By following the principles outlined in this evidence-based framework, communities, funders and those involved in developing and delivering place-based programs can work together to address complex problems in a way that values the lived experience of community members and optimises the chances of achieving long-term health improvement
Best practice · Community engagement · Grounded theory · Key (lock) · Nonprobability sampling · Power (physics) · Program evaluation · Public health · Work (physics) · Community Health and Development · Outdoor and Experiential Education · Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations
Reaching the hard-to-reach
Grounded theory research
Achieving successful community engagement
Community-based participatory research to engage disadvantaged communities
Grounded Theory
Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations
A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co‐design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health‐care teams
Mitigating unintended consequences of co‐design in health care
Boundary work
Putting context centre stage
Exploring community engagement in place-based approaches in areas of poor health and disadvantage
Health Action Zones
Whose place is it anyway? Representational politics in a place-based health initiative
Delivering Public Services
From medical to health geography
Assessing the Effect of Area Based Initiatives on Local Area Outcomes
People first
Member Checking
Influencing health policy through public deliberation
Scaling up
Understanding and representing 'place' in health research
Complexity and Uncertainty in Geography of Health Research
The Perception of the Environment
Emerging spheres of engagement
Capturing complexity in the evaluation of a major area-based initiative in community empowerment
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |