(Re)writing Russian History

December 2 on marked the 20th anniversary of the collapse of the Soviet Union. The evil empire and the Cold War disappeared, not with civil strife or the long-feared global conflagration, but suddenly and almost bloodlessly. As the nemesis and mirror of the west, the USSR had acted as a polestar for everything from foreign policy to weapons systems to popular culture, one that could divide as much as it united. Soviet history itself was contested ground, as it could be made to speak to everything from the general validity of socialism (and therefore capitalism) or to the nature of Russia (and therefore, the west). Twenty years on, this political valence has ebbed but has not disappeared entirely.Michael Kort's The Soviet Colossus, a classic survey of modern Russian history, is emblematic of the debates surrounding the Soviet past and how perspectives have changed - or, in some cases, stayed the same - as we move away from the Cold War/ Colossus remains among the most widely used texts on the USSR, and for good reason; it is accessible, well written, and covers a great range of material in a fairly short space. First published in 1985, Kort's work offered a general history of the USSR together with a concise account of pre-revolutionary Russia. Kort examined Russian political development from ancient Rus' through to the end of the old regime, highlighting the origins of the Russian autocracy, the intelligentsia, and the various strains of the late imperial period before moving on to Soviet history proper. The first edition of Colossus carried through to the gerontocracy of Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chemenko, and though the author was aware of the internal strains within Soviet society - and presciently drew attention, for instance, to the challenge of resurgent nationalism - he, like most contemporary observers, did not believe that such problems had become a challenge to the system itself (293). Kort amended successive editions to reflect new developments (the book now extends to the Putin era), though his treatment of earlier periods is largely unchanged.Colossus' narrative traced broad lines of continuity between pre- and postrevolutionary Russia, evoking throughout a highly bifurcated view of the world - east versus west. In part, this perspective grew out of the reality of the divergence between Russia and Europe, and in part reflected a rhetorical and heuristic tradition that has a long pedigree in both western and Russian historical scholarship. Consistent with this view, Colossus stressed the statist, bureaucratic, and authoritarian nature of Russian and Soviet societies, tracing historical continuity across the revolutionary divide. Yet in seeking continuity, Kort projected his conception of the USSR - totalitarian and antiwestern - deep into the Russian past.Kort's work fell firmly within the totalitarian school of Soviet history, a model that has been challenged over the years but remains popular. Broadly speaking, this approach conceives of the Soviet Union as a dictatorial police state in which a single ruler (Stalin) or the Communist party elite controlled an atomized, brutalized, and apathetic population through terror, surveillance, economic planning, and propaganda. This interpretive framework owed much to the pioneering theory of Hannah Arendt, as well as to the accounts of Russian emigres fleeing to the west. Foundational works by Robert Conquest, Merle Fainsod, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and others focused on the centrality of Communist ideology, along with the creation and function of the Soviet party-state, at the time still shrouded in much uncertainty.2 Such works provided invaluable accounts of the inner function of the Kremlin - the view from within the black box - along with the horrors of the Gulag, the purges, and collectivization. The totalitarian approach also stressed similarities between Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, a view that had policy implications for governments facing the postwar emergence of a Soviet superpower

Ancient history · Autocracy · Capitalism · Colossus computer · Communism · Democracy · Eastern Bloc · Economic history · Empire · Intelligentsia · Political science · Politics · Russian history · Socialism · History · Law · Russia and Soviet political economy · Soviet and Russian History

• Juxtaposing Past and Present in China Today

  Open Access•Wang Gungwu•The China Quarterly•1975

  Añadir item

• The History of the History of Xinjiang

  Gardner Bovingdon•Twentieth-Century China•2001

  Añadir item

• IV. the rehabilitation of Russia's rebels

  Brian Pearce, A M Pankratova•Central Asian Survey•1985

  Añadir item

• Nationalism and the Russian civil war

  Artin H Arslanian, Robert L Nichols•Soviet Studies•1979

  Añadir item

• Soviet historians review their own past

  George M Enteen, George Enteen•Soviet Studies•1969

  Añadir item

• Politics, ideology and history in the USSR

  Hans Rogger•Soviet Studies•1965

  Añadir item

• M. N. Pokrovsky and Soviet Historiography

  Open Access•Bernard W Eissenstat•Slavic Review•1969

  Añadir item

• Britain and the question of Mountainous Karabagh

  Artin H Arslanian•Middle Eastern Studies•1980

  Añadir item

• Shamil in Soviet historiography

  Moshe Gammer•Middle Eastern Studies•1992

  Añadir item

• The Second World War as a Problem in Historical Research

  Open Access•Hans-Adolf Jacobsen, Hans Adolf Jacobsen•World Politics•1964

  Añadir item

• Party Genealogy and the Soviet Historians (1920-1938)

  Open Access•Jonathan Frankel•Slavic Review•1966

  Añadir item

• The Stalinist Mentality and the Higher Learning

  Open Access•David Joravsky•Slavic Review•1983

  Añadir item

• Tatarovedenie and the "New Historiography" in the Soviet Union

  Open Access•Edward J Lazzerini•Slavic Review•1981

  Añadir item