Back to the Future? The Emergence of a Geneticized Conceptualization of Race in Sociology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5741599
AutoresReanne Frank (0000-0003-1993-0315, The Ohio State University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2015
Volumen661
Número1
Páginas51-64
Fecha de publicación2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002716215590775
OpenAlexW2281693509
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14
Referencias citadas39

Discoveries in human molecular genetics have reanimated unresolved debates over the nature of human difference. In this context, the idea that race has a discrete and measurable genetic basis is currently enjoying a resurgence. The return of a biologized construction of race is somewhat surprising because one of the primary pronouncements to come out of the Human Genome Project was one of human genetic similarity (i.e., humans are over 99.9 percent similar at the molecular level). Perhaps even more surprising is that genetically based notions of race have not been restricted to the biomedical sciences but have recently emerged within the social sciences, specifically sociology, to explicitly challenge a socially constructed understanding of race. Drawing on existing critiques, this article describes problems in recent sociological scholarship and the potential role of social scientists in future work occurring at the intersection of race and genetics. I argue that recent scholarly work meant to challenge the notion of race as a social construction actually makes a powerful case for its continued utility

Biology · Conceptualization · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Human science · Intersection (aeronautics) · Political science · Race (biology) · Scholarship · Social constructionism · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Law · Race, Genetics, and Society