Backsliding by Elite Collusion

Authoritarianism and Democratic Resurgence in Guatemala

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5741983
AutoresManuel Meléndez-Sánchez (0009-0004-6474-3484), Lucas Perelló (0000-0002-8142-7246, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen712
Número1
Páginas235-247
Fecha de publicación2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00027162251319179
OpenAlexW4408716448
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas14

Guatemala is a case study in democratic backsliding led not by an aggrandized executive, but by a coalition of elites who collude to maximize and protect their collective power. Beginning in the mid-2010s, a decentralized but deeply entrenched network of elites dismantled democracy when anticorruption efforts threatened their common interests. The 2023 election was widely expected to consolidate this authoritarian turn but, instead, delivered an unexpected democratic resurgence when a moderate anticorruption reformer secured a shocking victory and then successfully resisted a "slow-motion coup" aimed at preventing the transfer of power. The Guatemalan case suggests that, under elite collusion, elites can be more prone to splits and strategic errors than in other authoritarian settings. These missteps provide unexpected opportunities to reverse backsliding, but democrats must be prepared to capitalize on regime errors and repel authoritarian counteroffensives by building broad coalitions that work simultaneously across multiple arenas of democratic contestation

Authoritarianism · Collusion · Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Elite · Microeconomics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · International Development and Aid · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Politics and Society in Latin America