Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear

"Beyond "Heuristics and Biases

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5771119
AutoresGerd Gigerenzer (0000-0002-6163-5419, autor de correspondencia)
Año1991
Volumen2
Número1
Páginas83-115
Fecha de publicación1991-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEuropean Review of Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1046-3283 • E-ISSN: 1479-277X
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14792779143000033
OpenAlexW2151274689
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas177
Referencias citadas53

Most so-called "errors" in probabilistic reasoning are in fact not violations of probability theory. Examples of such "errors" include overconfidence bias, conjunction fallacy, and base-rate neglect. Researchers have relied on a very narrow normative view, and have ignored conceptual distinctions-e.g. single case versus relative frequency-fundamental to probability theory. By recognizing and using these distinctions, however, we can make apparently stable "errors" disappear, reappear, or even invert. I suggest what a reformed understanding of judgments under uncertainty might look like

Confirmation bias · Fallacy · Heuristics · Overconfidence effect · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Is military incompetence adaptive?

    Open Access•Dominic D P Johnson, Dominic Johnson et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2002

  • Is Military Incompetence Adaptive?

    Open Access•R W Wrangham, Richard Wrangham•Evolution and Human Behavior•1999

  • Cooperative strategies outside the laboratory — evidence from a long-term large-N-study in five countries

    Open Access•Ulrich Frey•Evolution and Human Behavior•2017

  • The epistemic responsibilities in medicine of beneficence and respect for patient autonomy

    Open Access•Abraham Schwab, A P Schwab•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2017

  • The Role of Representative Design in an Ecological Approach to Cognition

    Mandeep K Dhami, Ralph Hertwig et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2004

  • Ambiguities and unstated assumptions in probabilistic reasoning

    Raymond S Nickerson•Psychological Bulletin•1996

  • Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation

    C Randall Colvin, Jack Block•Psychological Bulletin•1994

  • Bias

    Thomas Kelly•Bias•2022

  • Adaptive Thinking

    Gerd Gigerenzer•Adaptive Thinking•2002

  • Managerial and Organizational Cognition

    Open Access•Gerard P Hodgkinson•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Judgment and Decision Making

    Open Access•Thomas D Gilovich, Dale W Griffin•Handbook of Social Psychology•2010

  • Judgment and Decision Making

    Open Access•Adele Diederich, Jerome R Busemeyer•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

  • Bounded Rationality

    Open Access•John Bendor•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Context, Environment, and Learning in Evolutionary Psychology

    Open Access•Laith Al-Shawaf, David M G Lewis et al.•Encyclopedia of Evolutionary…•2019

  • Prospect Theory

    Open Access•Floris Heukelom•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Seeing, Doing, and Knowing

    Mohan Matthen•SEEING, DOING, AND KNOWING: A…•2005

  • Statistical Inference as Severe Testing

    Open Access•Deborah G Mayo•Statistical Inference As Severe…•2018

  • Heuristics and Biases

    Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin et al.•Heuristics and biases•2012

  • On the accuracy of personality judgment

    David C Funder•Psychological Review•1995

  • The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence

    Open Access•Dale W Griffin, Dale Griffin et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1992

  • Intuition and Reasoning

    Jonathan St B T Evans•Psychological Inquiry•2010

  • Probabilistic mental models

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage et al.•Psychological Review•1991

  • Belief polarization is not always irrational.

    Alan Jern, Kai-Min Chang et al.•Psychological Review•2014

  • On the reality of cognitive illusions.

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1996

  • Individual differences in reasoning

    Open Access•Keith E Stanovich, Richard F West•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2000

  • Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty

    Open Access•Leda Cosmides•Cognition•1996

  • On narrow norms and vague heuristics

    Gerd Gigerenzer•Psychological Review•1996

  • Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy

    Open Access•Robert Brotherton, Christopher C French•Applied Cognitive Psychology•2014

  • Support theory

    Amos Tversky, Derek J Koehler•Psychological Review•1994

  • Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect

    Open Access•Thomas Mussweiler, Fritz Strack et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • The intolerance of uncertainty construct in the context of anxiety disorders

    R Nicholas Carleton•Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics•2012

  • Coping with Uncertainty

    Open Access•Raanan Lipshitz, Orna Strauss•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1997

  • Measuring Expectations

    Open Access•Charles F Manski•Econometrica•2004

  • Representativeness Revisited

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Shane Frederick•Heuristics and biases•2002

  • Fear of the unknown

    Open Access•R Nicholas Carleton•Journal of Anxiety Disorders•2016

  • Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration

    Open Access•Barbara Mellers, Barbara A Mellers et al.•Psychological Science•2001

  • The base rate fallacy reconsidered

    Open Access•Jonathan J Koehler•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1996

  • A Fallacious Fallacy

    Open Access•Jaakko Hintikka•Synthese•2004

  • Qué es un contexto para las teorías cognitivas del razonamiento

    Open Access•Jonatan García Campos, Saúl Sarabia López•Critica•2019

  • La autonomía de las tradiciones experimentales como problema epistemológico

    Open Access•Sergio Martinez•Critica•1995

  • Os Sistemas De Avaliação Da Eficácia Da Investigação Criminal No Brasil

    Open Access•Elton Luiz Bueno Candido, Julio Cesar De Aguiar•Revista Direito e Justiça…•2021

  • Human behavior in the context of low-probability high-impact events

    Open Access•Joakim Sundh•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Frequency Formats

    Open Access•Christoph Till, Ute Sproesser•Frontiers in Education•2020

  • Ignorance of the crowd

    Open Access•Fatima Bilkis Seeme, Fatima Seeme et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2025

  • No easy way out

    Open Access•Dirk Scheer, Sandra Venghaus et al.•Energy Sustainability and Society•2025

  • Tragic Flaws

    Open Access•Nathan Ballantyne•Journal of the American…•2022

  • On the Goals and Limitations of Psychological Science

    Open Access•Gideon Keren•Perspectives on Psychological…•2026

  • What Can AI Learn from Psychology and When Can AI Neglect it

    Open Access•Yingjin Xu•Fudan Journal of the Humanities…•2023

  • Not all hands get hot

    Open Access•João Niza Braga, Susana Jacinto et al.•Asian Journal Of Social Psychology•2024

  • Effects of uncertain system information on users' performance, confidence, and trust in aided linguistic judgement

    Open Access•Melle Zijlstra, Stephen J Payne•International Journal of…•2026

  • Is it a judgment of representativeness? Re-examining the birth sequence problem

    Open Access•Lim M Leong, Johannes Müller‐Trede et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2023

  • Character-Infused Ethical Decision Making

    Open Access•Brenda Nguyen, Mary Crossan•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • Effects of trust and perceived self-efficacy on aided judgement

    Open Access•Melle Zijlstra, Stephen J Payne•Behaviour and Information…•2025

  • Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them

    Open Access•Andrea Bonaccorsi, Riccardo Apreda et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Lossy encoding of distributions in judgment under uncertainty

    Open Access•Tadeg Quillien, Neil R Bramley et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2025

  • Limits on simulation approaches in intuitive physics

    Open Access•Ethan Ludwin-Peery, Neil R Bramley et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2021

  • A description–experience gap in statistical intuitions

    Open Access•Christin Schulze, Ralph Hertwig•Cognition•2021

  • Unskilled, underperforming, or unaware? Testing three accounts of individual differences in metacognitive monitoring

    Open Access•Jesse H Grabman, Chad S Dodson•Cognition•2024

  • A rational reinterpretation of dual-process theories

    Open Access•Smitha Milli, Falk Lieder et al.•Cognition•2021

  • The essence of bounded rationality and debate over its value

    LIU Yongfang•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2022

  • Fallacies and biases

    Open Access•Ermioni Seremeta, Monique Flecken et al.•Pragmatics & Cognition•2024

  • Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological defence of human rationality

    Open Access•Maarten Boudry, Michael Vlerick et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2015

  • Stop chasing unicorns of climate inaction

    Open Access•Lise Isabella Meistrup, Jacob Klitmøller•Theory & Psychology•2023

  • Heuristics and Biases in Theory Formation

    Open Access•Klaus Fiedler•Theory & Psychology•1991

  • Infinity

    Open Access•Ruma Falk•Theory & Psychology•1994

  • Heuristics and Biases

    Open Access•Vaibhav Garg, Jean Camp•IEEE Technology and Society…•2013

  • Doing and Knowing

    Andrew P Vayda, Bradley B Walters et al.•Investigating Local Knowledge•2019

  • Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation

    Open Access•David Dunning, Judith A Meyerowitz et al.•Heuristics and biases•2002

  • The Affect Heuristic

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Melissa L Finucane et al.•Heuristics and biases•2002

  • Stereotypes as Explanations

    Open Access•Vincent Yzerbyt, Craig Mcgarty et al.•Stereotypes as Explanations•2002

  • Sobre o debate freqüentista versus probabilista

    Open Access•Antonio Roazzi, David P O''Brien et al.•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2003

  • Gigerenzer's Evolutionary Arguments against Rational Choice Theory

    Open Access•Armin W Schulz•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • Confidence and accuracy in person perception

    William B Swann, Jr Swann William B et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Predicting persons' versus a person's goodness

    Clayton R Critcher, David Dunning•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  • How alike is it versus how likely is it

    Maya Bar-Hillel, Maya Bar‐Hillel et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making

    Mário B Ferreira, Leonel Garcia-Marques et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • Determinants of intergroup differentiation in the illusory correlation task

    Open Access•Mariëtte Berndsen, Russell Spears et al.•British Journal of Psychology•1999

  • Presuppositions, provisos, and probability

    Open Access•Dragana Lassiter, Daniel Lassiter•Semantics and Pragmatics•2012

  • A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to Studying the Role of Overconfidence in Problem Gambling

    Open Access•Jazmin Camchong, Adam S Goodie et al.•Journal of Gambling Studies•2007

  • Violence risk assessment and risk communication

    Paul Slovic, Jl Monahan et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2000

  • Domain-specific reasoning

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer, Klaus Hug•Cognition•1992

  • Unintentional Trolling

    Open Access•René Baston, Benedict Kenyah-Damptey•Philosophy & Technology•2021

  • The Conjunction Fallacy

    Woojin Chung, Kevin Dorst et al.•2023

  • The conjunction fallacy

    Willard Chung, Kevin Dorst et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2024

  • Conjugal Love from a Sociological Perspective

    Open Access•Hélène Belleau, Chiara Piazzesi et al.•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•2020

  • The Oxford Handbook of Rationality

    Alfred R Mele, Piers Rawling•The Oxford handbook of rationality•2004

  • Charles R. Plott’s collected papers on the experimental foundations of economic and political science

    Open Access•Andreas Ortmann•Journal of Economic Psychology•2003

  • Las variables sociales y la conciencia metacognitiva de los jóvenes adultos colombianos

    Open Access•Antonio P Gutierrez De Blume, Diana Marcela Montoya Londoño et al.•Revista Latinoamericana de…•2022

  • Discovery in Cognitive Psychology

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer•Science in Context•1992

  • Explanations for Common Responses to the Blue/Green Cab Probabilistic Inference Word Problem

    Open Access•Robert M Hamm•Psychological Reports•1993

  • The natural frequency hypothesis and evolutionary arguments

    Open Access•Yuichi Amitani•Mind & Society•2014

  • Gigerenzer’s ‘external validity argument’ against the heuristics and biases program

    Open Access•Andrea Polonioli•Mind & Society•2012

  • Scoring and keying multiple choice tests

    Open Access•Maya Bar‐Hillel, David V Budescu et al.•Mind & Society•2005

  • How the United Kingdom's Criminal Records Bureau can reduce the prevalence of elder abuse by improving recruitment decision‐making

    Open Access•Nageen Mustafa•The Journal of Adult Protection•2008

  • Beyond dislike

    Open Access•Emile G Bruneau, Hanna Szekeres et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2019

  • Gamifying a web survey among adolescents

    Aigul Mavletova, Kirill Gavrilov et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2018

  • Perception of technological risk

    Ortwin Renn, Christina Benighaus•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Revisiting the primary bias

    Jocelyn Raude, Christina Xiao et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2022

  • The gambler’s fallacy fallacy (fallacy)

    Marko Kovic, Silje Kristiansen•Journal of Risk Research•2017

  • Expert opinion and probabilistic volcanic risk assessment

    Amy Donovan, J Richard Eiser et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2015

  • Induction

    John H Holland, Keith J Holyoak et al.•Induction•1986

  • The Empire of Chance

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer, Zeno G Swijtink et al.•Empire of Chance•1989

  • A Mathematical Theory of Evidence

    Gregory Shafer, Glenn Shafer•Mathematical Theory of Evidence•1976

  • Classical Probability in the Enlightenment

    Lorraine Daston•Classical Probability in the…•1988

  • Logic of Statistical Inference

    Open Access•Ian Hacking, Jan-Willem Romeijn•Logic of Statistical Inference•2016

  • Calibration of probabilities

    Open Access•Sarah Lichtenstein, Baruch Fischhoff et al.•Judgment under uncertainty•1982

  • Extensional versus intuitive reasoning

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Review•1983

  • Reasons for confidence.

    Asher Koriat, Sarah Lichtenstein et al.•Journal of Experimental…•1980

  • Automatic and effortful processes in memory.

    Lynn Hasher, Rose T Zacks•Journal of Experimental…•1979

  • Features of similarity.

    Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1977

  • The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments

    Open Access•Maya Bar-Hillel, Maya Bar‐Hillel•Acta Psychologica•1980

  • Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model

    David M Grether•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1980

  • On the psychology of prediction.

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1973

  • Models of man, social and rational

    Herbert Alexander Simon•Models of man, social and rational•1987

  • The logic of social exchange

    Open Access•Leda Cosmides•Cognition•1989

  • Attribution Theory and Research

    Harold H Kelley, John L Michela•Annual Review of Psychology•1980

  • The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900

    Theodore M Porter•Rise of Statistical Thinking,…•1986

  • Naive attributors' attributions and predictions

    Gary L Wells, John H Harvey•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • The power of consensus

    Ranald D Hansen, James M Donoghue•Journal of Personality and Social…•1977

  • The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another person

    Open Access•Zvi Ginosar, Yaacov Trope•Journal of Experimental Social…•1980

  • Are People Programmed to Commit Fallacies? Further Thoughts about the Interpretation of Experimental Data on Probability Judgment

    Open Access•L Jonathan Cohen, Larry Cohen•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1982

  • Training for safety in automated person–machine systems

    Claire M Spettell, Robert M Liebert•American Psychologist•1986

  • Abstraction is Uncooperative

    Open Access•Jonathan E Adler•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1984

  • Attribution and the psychology of prediction

    Richard E Nisbett, Eugene Borgida•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

  • Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions

    Gary L Wells, John H Harvey•Journal of Personality and Social…•1977

  • Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty

    Zvi Ginossar, Yaacov Trope•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction

    Icek Ajzen•Journal of Personality and Social…•1977

  • Shareability

    Open Access•Jennifer J Freyd, J FREYD•Cognitive Science•1983

  • The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900

    Open Access•Patricia Cline Cohen, Theodore M Porter•Rise of Statistical Thinking,…•2020

  • Social psychology as history

    Kenneth J Gergen•Journal of Personality and Social…•1973

  • Human Information Processing and Adjudication

    Open Access•Michael J Saks, Robert F Kidd•Law & Society Review•1981

Obras citantes distintas177
Citas por año5,06
Intervalo de citas1991 - 2026 (36)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoSí
Tipos de citaNeutras: 170
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae