Ideology and Interpersonal Emotion Management

Redefining Identity in Two Support Groups

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5832019
AutoresLinda E Francis (0000-0003-0346-6642, Stony Brook University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1997
Volumen60
Número2
Páginas153-153
Fecha de publicación1997-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Psychology Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0190-2725 • E-ISSN: 1939-8999
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/2787102
OpenAlexW2042879945
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas82
Referencias citadas16

This ethnographic study demonstrates the process by which our emotions are constructed not only by ourselves but also by others. Support groups for divorce or bereavement are used to illustrate the process of interpersonal emotion management. The study considers how support groups with differing ideologies produce dissimilar situational definitions for the loss of a spouse. Each of these definitions promotes different cognitive and affective outcomes for the participants. Despite these differences in definitions, the group leaders use a largely identical process of interpersonal emotion management, in which they redefine not only the event of spousal loss but also the sufferer's very identity. These redefinitions encourage understandings and emotions that coincide with the groups' own ideological perspectives. In addition, the results of the study are unexpectedly congruent with affect control theory, thus demonstrating that the propositions of this theory inform qualitative as well as quantitative research

Emotional Labor in Professions · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies