Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Italian Epistemic Disclaimer Non so [I Don't Know] in a Corpus of Gynaecological Interactions

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5900524
AutoresRamona Bongelli (0000-0002-1276-4660, University of Macerata, autor de correspondencia), Andrzej Zuczkowski (0000-0002-9146-7807, University of Macerata), Ilaria Riccioni (0000-0001-8449-6012, University of Macerata)
Año2023
Volumen8
Número4
Páginas226
Fecha de publicación2023-09-22
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaLanguages (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
EditorialMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages8040226
OpenAlexW4386961112
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas61

Viewing conversations from an epistemic perspective involves analysing how participants navigate their knowledge, handle uncertainty, and address their lack of knowledge. This article focuses on the use of epistemic disclaimers, i.e., linguistic expressions that speakers employ to indicate uncertainty or lack of knowledge, in a collection of Italian gynaecological conversations throughout pregnancy. Specifically, the study examines the occurrences, features, and pragmatic functions of the epistemic disclaimers, with a specific focus on Non so, which is the Italian equivalent of "I don't know" in English, the most extensively researched epistemic disclaimer. The study aims to (1) investigate the types and frequency of uncertain and unknowing epistemic disclaimers in the gynaecological corpus and (2) identify their characteristics and pragmatic functions. The primary findings indicate that epistemic disclaimers are primarily used to convey unknowledge rather than uncertainty. However, while patients use more epistemic disclaimers than doctors, they mainly use them to communicate unknowledge, whereas doctors mainly use them to express uncertainty. Regardless, their usage does not appear problematic in conversational terms since the topics for which they are used fall outside the domains of knowledge of each party

Disclaimer · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • ‘The benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks… they say’

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Alessia Bertolazzi et al.•Language and Dialogue•2024

  • Rhetorical questions and epistemic stance in an Italian Facebook corpus during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski et al.•Open Linguistics•2025

  • Beyond Rhetorical Questions

    Irene Koshik•Beyond Rhetorical Questions•2005

  • Communication in Medical Care

    Open Access•John Heritage, Douglas W Maynard•Communication in Medical Care•2006

  • Territory of Information

    Akio Kamio•Territory of Information•1997

  • Varieties of Uncertainty in Health Care

    Open Access•Paul K J Han, William M P Klein et al.•Medical Decision Making•2011

  • Epistemic Stance in English Conversation

    Elise Kärkkäinen•Epistemic stance in English…•2003

  • Conversation Analysis

    Gene H Lerner•Conversation analysis•2004

  • The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation

    Open Access•Tanya Stivers, L Mondada et al.•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Latin as a tool for social differentiation and epistemic asymmetry

    Franca Orletti•Language and Dialogue•2019

  • Demonstrative questions and epistemic authority management in medium-sitter interactions

    Open Access•Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni et al.•Language and Dialogue•2020

  • Questions and epistemic stance

    Open Access•Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni et al.•Ampersand•2018

  • ‘It feels like my metabolism has shut down’. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation

    Open Access•Olaug S Lian, Sarah Nettleton et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Socially constructed and structurally conditioned conflicts in territories of medical uncertainty

    Open Access•Olaug S Lian, Catherine Robson•Social Theory & Health•2018

  • Epistemics in Action

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • I don't know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge

    Ann Weatherall•Research on Language and Social…•2011

  • Intervening With Conversation Analysis

    Jeffrey D Robinson, J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2014

  • Forgetfulness as an Interactive Resource

    Charles Goodwin•Social Psychology Quarterly•1987

  • Knowledge negotiation and interactional power

    Open Access•Stina Ericsson, Dima Bitar et al.•Multilingua•2022

  • The Terms of Agreement

    Open Access•J Heritage, G Raymond•Social Psychology Quarterly•2005

  • Why do you ask

    Alice F Freed, Alice Freed et al.•"Why do you ask?"•2010

  • The Epistemic Engine

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • A coding scheme for question–response sequences in conversation

    Open Access•T Stivers, N J Enfield•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Ignorance-unmasking questions in the Royal-Sarkozy presidential debate

    Open Access•Laura Vincze, Ramona Bongelli et al.•Discourse Studies•2016

  • Dueling in the clinic

    Open Access•T Stivers, Rose Mccabe•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Hypothetical questions in everyday Italian conversations

    Open Access•Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni et al.•Lingua•2020

  • Conversational mitigation

    Open Access•Bruce Fraser•Journal of Pragmatics•1980

  • Asymmetrical knowledge claims in general practice consultations with frequently attending patients

    Open Access•Steven Ari, Steven M Ari et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • Mitigation and epistemic positions in troubles talk

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Ramona Bongelli et al.•Language & Communication•2014

  • Reformulation markers and their functions

    Open Access•Ilaria Fiorentini, Andrea Sansò•Journal of Pragmatics•2017

  • Epistemic constructions at work. A corpus study on spoken Italian dialogues

    Open Access•Paola Pietrandrea•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • A range of uses of negative epistemic constructions in German

    Open Access•Henrike Helmer, Silke Reineke et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2016

  • Abandoning dead ends

    Open Access•L Keevallik•Journal of Pragmatics•2016

  • More than an epistemic hedge

    Open Access•Simona Pekarek Doehler•Journal of Pragmatics•2016

  • Tensions in the epistemic domain and claims of no-knowledge

    Open Access•Jan Lindstrom, Karlsson et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2016

  • A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction

    Open Access•Jan Lindstrom, Yael Maschler et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2016

  • On mitigation

    Open Access•Claudia Caffi•Journal of Pragmatics•1999

  • Dubitative questions and epistemic stance

    Open Access•Ilaria Riccioni, Ramona Bongelli et al.•Lingua•2018

  • The epistemics of social relations

    Open Access•G Raymond, J Heritage•Language in Society•2006

  • Claiming Insufficient Knowledge

    Open Access•Wayne A Beach, Terrir Metzger•Human Communication Research•1997

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2025 (2)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae