Examining the Collocational Knowledge of Libyan Arabic-Speaking Learners of English in Different Learning Environments
Classroom Learning vs. Naturalistic Learning
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5901351 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carima Awaj (University Elmergib, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 3 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 16 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-05-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages3020016 |
| OpenAlex | W2799296639 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 40 |
The recognition that collocation is an important, yet challenging, variable in second language development has attracted extensive research into how to enhance collocation learning. This study examines the collocational knowledge of Libyan Arabic-speaking learners of English by focusing on the influence of two main factors, the learning environment and the native language (L1), since it has been claimed that these factors affect L2 collocation development. Unlike previous studies on collocations which have largely focused on testing classroom learners, this study compares the use of English collocations by both naturalistic learners and classroom learners to explore which learning environment enhances collocation development more. Thirty-six Libyan learners participated in this study (18 formal classroom learners and 18 informal naturalistic learners); they were asked to complete production and reception tests of English collocations. A questionnaire and a vocabulary recognition task (VRT) were additionally used to facilitate interpretation of the data, by eliciting information about learners' degrees of exposure to informal, naturalistic English and their knowledge of the individual words in collocations. The results showed that collocations are a problematic aspect of language for all L2 learners in the study. However, a naturalistic setting was found to provide a better learning environment for collocation development than a classroom setting. Additionally, the native language of the learner was also found to have an effect on their L2 collocational knowledge. This influence had more of a positive effect on naturalistic learners' knowledge, and a more negative effect on classroom learners' knowledge. The findings also revealed a strong correlation between learners' collocational knowledge and their amount of exposure to informal, naturalistic English
Collocation (remote sensing · Language acquisition · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Naturalism · Vocabulary · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Formulaic Sequences
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Pattern Grammar
Collocations in a Learner Corpus
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
L2 Learner Production and Processing of Collocation
Prefabricated Patterns in Advanced EFL Writing
English Language Corpora
Formulaic Sequences
Phraseology and Second Language Proficiency
The Treatment of Collocations and Idioms in Learners' Dictionaries
The Use of Collocations by Advanced Learners of English and Some Implications for Teaching
Collocations
Should we teach EFL students collocations
Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure
The Essential Contributions of Formal Instruction in Adult Second Language Learning
Formal and Informal Linguistic Environments in Language Acquisition and Language Learning
What are collocations
The Role of Vocabulary Teaching
The idiom principle and the open choice principle
Adult Acquisition of English as a Second Language Under Different Conditions of Exposure
The Effect of Formal Language Instruction on the Order of Morpheme Acquisition1
Adult Performance on the Slope Test
Universals of Lexical Simplification
Three (or four) levels of word cooccurence restriction
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |