What factors influence Australian media professionals' level of agreement with guidelines for reporting suicide
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5904185 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jaelea Skehan (0000-0003-4854-7243, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia, autor de correspondencia), Ross Tynan (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia), Renate Thienel (0000-0003-0381-7828, School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Australia), Jane Pirkis (0000-0002-2538-4472, The University of Melbourne), Myfanwy Maple (0000-0001-9398-4886, University of New England), Brian Kelly (0000-0003-1834-2992, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-01-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Media International Australia (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1329-878X • E-ISSN: 2200-467X |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1329878x241309369 |
| OpenAlex | W4406301089 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 35 |
This study examined whether Australian media professionals agree with guidelines for reporting suicide (Mindframe guidelines) and the factors that may influence their level of agreement. Participants completed an online survey to assess their level of agreement with Mindframe guidelines and to explore factors that might be associated with guideline agreement. These factors included demographic variables, suicide stigma, exposure to suicide, perceived strength of the evidence, personal use of guidelines, organisational compliance with guidelines and prior exposure to Mindframe. In total, 262 Australian media professionals from broadcast, print, digital and other media were recruited. Participants agreed with 15 of the 16 guideline statements, with linear regression showing that prior exposure to Mindframe was a significant predictor of agreement as was the perceived strength of the evidence, personal application of guidelines and stigma. Guidelines for reporting suicide should be enhanced by an active implementation strategy informed by knowledge and views of media professionals
Family medicine · Guideline · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Psychiatry · Suicide prevention · Clinical Psychology · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research · Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Lost in knowledge translation
The Stigma of Suicide Scale
Suicide prevention strategies revisited
Role of media reports in completed and prevented suicide
Correlates of Suicide Stigma and Suicide Literacy in the Community
Media reporting of suicide and adherence to media guidelines
“We Don’t Cover Suicide … (Except When We Do Cover Suicide)”
Suicide exposure and impact within a non-representative Australian community sample
Newspaper reporting of suicides in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Guangzhou
Changes in suicide rates following media reports on celebrity suicide
The Influence of Suggestion on Suicide
Death knocks, professional practice, and the public good
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |