Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Why do these people’s opinions matter?’ Positioning known referents as unnameable others

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5965254
AutoresClare Jackson (0000-0002-2023-458X)
Año2013
Volumen15
Número3
Páginas299-317
Fecha de publicación2013-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1461445613480587
OpenAlexW2323771230
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11
Referencias citadas25

The way we refer to third parties in talk is one means through which relationships between speaker, recipients and referents are made relevant. A range of referring expressions is available and any number of expressions might correctly refer to a referent. One guide to selection is the preference for achieving recognition and the default practice is, where possible, to use a name. This conversation analytic article describes a practice that does not fit the default pattern. In this practice, speakers select a broad social category (typically gendered, e.g. guy, woman, but not always, e.g. people) when a recognitional form could (and perhaps, ought to) have been used. Despite the designed selection of a categorical form, the referent(s) remains recognitional. For example, in one extract, a mother in conversation with her teenage daughter refers to a collective made up of her former husband and his girlfriend as ‘these people’. The daughter has no difficulty working out who ‘these people’ are and recognizes it as a reference to her father and stepmother. I show that this designedly categorical formulation often contributes to hostile action by distancing the referent(s) from parties to the interaction - making the referent(s) unnameable and not connected to the speaker and recipient. The role of demonstrative pronouns - this, that, these - are discussed in relation to constructing social distance between speakers, recipients and referents

Categorical variable · Cognitive psychology · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Deixis · Demonstrative · Honorific · Linguistics · Pronoun · Referent · Social distance · Communication · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Explaining variance in writers’ use of demonstratives

    Open Access•Annemarie Maes, Emiel Krahmer et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

  • A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference

    Open Access•David Peeters, Emiel Krahmer et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2021

  • Academic Writing Tutorials for International Students

    Christopher Leyland•Language and Education•2020

  • “Please protect the Jews”

    Shani Burke•Journal of Language Aggression…•2017

  • When personal names are mentioned in conversations

    Open Access•Kevin A Whitehead, Gene H Lerner•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2026

  • Managing Awkward, Sensitive, or Delicate Topics in (Chinese) Radio Medical Consultations

    Guodong Yu, Yaxin Wu•Discourse Processes•2015

  • Grammar in time

    Open Access•R Clift, Chase Wesley Raymond•Linguistics•2025

  • Copula variation in Asturian Spanish and the multidimensionality of stancetaking in interaction

    Open Access•Sonia Barne•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2018

  • Actions in practice

    Open Access•R Clift, Chase Wesley Raymond•Discourse Studies•2018

  • The transgressive that

    Open Access•Rachael Hayward, R Wooffitt et al.•Discourse Studies•2015

  • Referring to somebody

    Open Access•Kevin A Whitehead, Gene H Lerner•Journal of Pragmatics•2020

  • Demonstratives

    Holger Diessel•Demonstratives•1999

  • Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction

    Emanuel A Schegloff•Studies in Anaphora•1996

  • Lectures on Conversation

    Harvey Sacks•Lectures on conversation•1995

  • Alternative recognitionals in person reference

    Open Access•T Stivers•Person Reference in Interaction•2007

  • Syntax and Lexis in Conversation

    Auli Hakulinen, Margret Selting•Syntax and lexis in conversation•2005

  • Studies in Social Interaction

    Christopher Jenks•Studies in Social Interaction•2014

  • Is ’woman’ always relevantly gendered

    C Kitzinger•Gender and Language•2007

  • VII. Gendered `People

    Open Access•Clare Stockill, C Kitzinger•Feminism & Psychology•2007

  • Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct

    Paul Drew•Research on Language and Social…•1998

  • Accessibility vs. physical proximity

    Open Access•Samer Jarbou, Samir Omar Jarbou•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Lessons from the Intersexed

    Susan A Farrell, Suzanne J Kessler•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1999

  • Directions in Sociolinguistics

    J Bosco, John J Gumperz et al.•TESOL Quarterly•1973

  • A Symposium on the Clinton-Lewinsky Affair

    Open Access•A Stein•Sexualities•1999

  • Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar

    Open Access•Holger Diessel•Cognitive Linguistics•2006

  • Referential problems in conversation

    Open Access•J C P Auer•Journal of Pragmatics•1984

  • The limits of questioning

    Open Access•J Heritage•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Deixis and subjectivity

    Open Access•Christiane Marchello-Nizia•Journal of Pragmatics•2005

  • Demonstratives in Space and Interaction

    Open Access•N J Enfield•Language•2003

  • Explorations in the Deictic Field

    William F Hanks•Current Anthropology•2005

Obras citantes distintas11
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2015 - 2026 (12)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 11
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae