Why do these people’s opinions matter?’ Positioning known referents as unnameable others
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5965254 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Clare Jackson (0000-0002-2023-458X) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 299-317 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Discourse Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445613480587 |
| OpenAlex | W2323771230 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 11 |
| Referencias citadas | 25 |
The way we refer to third parties in talk is one means through which relationships between speaker, recipients and referents are made relevant. A range of referring expressions is available and any number of expressions might correctly refer to a referent. One guide to selection is the preference for achieving recognition and the default practice is, where possible, to use a name. This conversation analytic article describes a practice that does not fit the default pattern. In this practice, speakers select a broad social category (typically gendered, e.g. guy, woman, but not always, e.g. people) when a recognitional form could (and perhaps, ought to) have been used. Despite the designed selection of a categorical form, the referent(s) remains recognitional. For example, in one extract, a mother in conversation with her teenage daughter refers to a collective made up of her former husband and his girlfriend as ‘these people’. The daughter has no difficulty working out who ‘these people’ are and recognizes it as a reference to her father and stepmother. I show that this designedly categorical formulation often contributes to hostile action by distancing the referent(s) from parties to the interaction - making the referent(s) unnameable and not connected to the speaker and recipient. The role of demonstrative pronouns - this, that, these - are discussed in relation to constructing social distance between speakers, recipients and referents
Categorical variable · Cognitive psychology · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Deixis · Demonstrative · Honorific · Linguistics · Pronoun · Referent · Social distance · Communication · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology
Explaining variance in writers’ use of demonstratives
A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference
Academic Writing Tutorials for International Students
“Please protect the Jews”
When personal names are mentioned in conversations
Managing Awkward, Sensitive, or Delicate Topics in (Chinese) Radio Medical Consultations
Grammar in time
Copula variation in Asturian Spanish and the multidimensionality of stancetaking in interaction
Actions in practice
The transgressive that
Referring to somebody
Demonstratives
Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction
Lectures on Conversation
Alternative recognitionals in person reference
Syntax and Lexis in Conversation
Studies in Social Interaction
Is ’woman’ always relevantly gendered
VII. Gendered `People
Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct
Accessibility vs. physical proximity
Lessons from the Intersexed
Directions in Sociolinguistics
A Symposium on the Clinton-Lewinsky Affair
Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar
Referential problems in conversation
The limits of questioning
Deixis and subjectivity
Demonstratives in Space and Interaction
Explorations in the Deictic Field
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 11 |