Exploring the military mindset
Phenomenological insights for security sector reform in Turkey
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6094062 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Çağkan Sayın (Başkent University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Páginas | 97-133 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | New Perspectives on Turkey (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0896-6346 • E-ISSN: 1305-3299 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0896634600005781 |
| OpenAlex | W2274522998 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
This study focuses on the mindset of a group of post-graduate cadets and academic cadres of the Turkish Military Academy and attempts to reveal, explore, and interpret this mindset regarding the normative structure of security sector reform, as well as the cultural and historical background of the Turkish context. While formal structures can be changed rather rapidly, changes in the underlying interpretive frameworks require more time and have no guarantee of institutionalization. Such changes entail the transformation of prevailing norms, perceptions, conceptions, and patterns of thought that underpin the role(s) of the military. If security sector reform aims to transform military culture and the civilian-military relationships in specific contexts, the traditional military mindset also must undergo a substantial transformation. How can we understand such a transformation? To answer this question, the methodological background of the study derives from linguistic-oriented phenomenology as a means for revealing and interpreting the mindset of post-graduate cadets and military academic cadres. The results of the research indicate that there are three dominant meaning clusters in the mindset of the sampled group, involving the parameters of paternalism, old security understanding, suspicion towards the civilian realm, and an understanding of state-society relationships that mark the pre-security sector reform era. The prevalence of these understandings might pose serious challenges to the internalization of the normative aspects of security sector reform and to the compliance to reforms
Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Mindset · Normative · Political science · Public relations · Realm · Sociology · Turkish · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Turkey's Politics and Society
The postmodern military
Turkey and The West
The Myth of the Military-Nation
Cluster Analysis
Symbolic Interactionism
The social construction of reality
The Logic of Appropriateness
The phenomenology of the social world
The Growth Of Cluster Analysis
Beyond the Realist Theories
The Restructuring of the Military High Command in the Seventh Harmonization Package and its Ramifications for Civil–Military Relations in Turkey
Early Australian–South African Connections up to the Establishment of Official Relations in 1945
Realistic Realism? American Political Realism, Clausewitz and Raymond Aron on the Problem of Means and Ends in International Politics
Ethnicity, Integration, and the Military
The state tradition in Turkey
The Rhetoric of Organizational Change
The Turkish Military's March toward Europe
Problems of democratic governance of civil‐military relations in Turkey and the European Union enlargement zone
Worldviews in Foreign Policy
Towards a New Conceptualization of Democratization and Civil-Military Relations
Democratic society and its enemies
The Anatomy of the Turkish Military's Political Autonomy
Political Culture, Political Structure and Political Change
Facing its Waterloo in diplomacy
Continuity and change
The discordant voices of 'security
Transformation of the Turkish Military and the Path to Democracy
Volunteering for Risk
Turkey's EU Candidacy and Civil-Military Relations
The Turkish Military's Decision to Intervene
The Military and the Consolidation of Democracy
Institutionalized Organizations
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |