Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Legitimizing Organizations via Research

Facilitating Possibilities through the Study of Relational, Emergent, Transformative, and Change-Oriented Organizations (Retcos)

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6111985
AutoresKatherine K Chen (0000-0003-1826-5501, The City College of New York and Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), autor de correspondencia), James M Mandiberg (0000-0001-8641-9125, Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College and Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY))
Año2024
Volumen26
Número3
Páginas360-373
Fecha de publicación2024-05-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPublic Integrity (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1558-0989 • E-ISSN: 1099-9922
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10999922.2023.2262212
OpenAlexW4387167219
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas58

Under multiple public administration reforms since the 1980s, public bureaucracies' activities range from connecting with markets to inviting the participation of service users, citizens, and networks of organizations in policy development, decision-making, and implementation. Despite this broadening of stakeholder participation, certain organizations are at risk of being overlooked, despite their direct involvement in efforts to engage communities and address persistent social problems. We contend that one reason for this exclusion is that these organizations are not recognized as their own organizational type. This paper identifies Relational, Emergent, Transformative, and Change-Oriented Organizations (RETCOs) as a discrete organizational type, and argues that they should be represented in the model cases that are used to educate public administrators, recognized as worthy of public funding and support, and included in public administration research. Recognizing RETCOs as legitimate stakeholders can correct some of the ethical problems of under-representation of important voices and perspectives in government-citizen interfaces. RETCOs are most appropriately studied through qualitative research methods that are sensitive to what make RETCOs a uniquely responsive organizational type, including their prioritizing of relationships within organizations, emergent rather than fixed organizational forms, goals of transformation, and commitments to liberatory social and economic change.Keywords: Participationvoiceorganizing process AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the audiences at the Scandinavian Consortium for Organizational Research (SCANCOR) at Stanford University and the annual meeting for the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE) for their comments on presentations of earlier versions of this paper, as well as the guest editors and journal editors, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on previous drafts of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 The term primary stakeholders refers to clients or participants to distinguish them from other stakeholders, such as evaluators, certifiers, or licensers.2 RETCOs include Rothschild and Whitt's (Citation1986) collectivist-democratic organization, an ideal-type that identifies organizations based on practices that afford flexibility, voice, and commitment to a collective mission. However, RETCOs more broadly highlights processes and without imposing the term democratic upon collectivities; thus, RETCOs can include groups that do not foreground democratic processes. For instance, groups that center indigenous and persons of color have other terms for their processes that foreground interdependence and relations with the past and future generations.3 Such methods are not inherently adept at capturing process and meaning-making among RETCOs; these methods can still be deployed in superficial, extractive, and exploitative ways—see for example, complaints about how the use of interviews can misreport persons' actual practices (Jerolmack & Khan, Citation2014)

Bureaucracy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Public service · Sociology · Stakeholder · Transformative learning · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Organizational critique and the design of a prefigurative social order

    Open Access•Robert Jungmann, Florence Eyok•Current Sociology•2026

  • Unveiling Power Dynamics

    Ashley E Nickels, Staci M Zavattaro•Public Integrity•2024

  • Feminist organizations

    Myra Marx Ferree, Patricia Yancey Martin•Feminist organizations•1995

  • The cooperative workplace

    Joyce Rothschild•The cooperative workplace•1986

  • Mohawk Interruptus

    Open Access•Audra Simpson•Mohawk Interruptus•2014

  • Abductive Analysis

    Iddo Tavory, Stefan Timmerman et al.•Abductive Analysis•2014

  • Model Cases

    M Krause•Model Cases•2021

  • Creative research methods in the social sciences

    Kenneth J Gergen, Helen Kara et al.•Creative Research Methods in the…•2015

  • Public Governance Paradigms

    Jacob Torfing, Kurt Klausen et al.•Public governance paradigms•2020

  • Data Feminism

    Open Access•Catherine D’ignazio, Catherine D'Ignazio et al.•Data Feminism•2020

  • The New Public Governance?

    Erik Hans Klijn, Stephen P Osborne•The new public governance•2010

  • Discard Studies

    Open Access•Max Liboiron, Josh Lepawsky•Discard Studies•2022

  • Enabling Creative Chaos

    Katherine K Chen, Katherine Kang-Ning Chen•Enabling Creative Chaos•2009

  • Must I Grow a Pair of Balls to Theorize about Theory in Organization and Management Studies?

    Open Access•Ann L Cunliffe•Organization Theory•2022

  • On Organizational Becoming

    Haridimos Tsoukas, Roland Chia et al.•Organization Science•2002

  • Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking

    Karl E Weick, Kathleen M Sutcliffe et al.•Organization Science•2005

  • Body and Soul

    A Nelson•Body and Soul•2011

  • Nonprofit Neighborhoods

    Claire Dunning•Nonprofit Neighborhoods•2022

  • Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector

    Open Access•David Billis•Hybrid Organizations and the…•2010

  • Nonprofits for Hire

    Steven Rathgeb Smith, Michael Lipsky et al.•Nonprofits for Hire•1993

  • Organization Without Authority

    Ann Swidler•Organization Without Authority•1979

  • Indigenous knowledges, priorities and processes in qualitative organization and management research

    Open Access•Tyron R Love•Qualitative Research in…•2019

  • Another organization is possible

    Open Access•Jason Spicer, Tamara Kay•Sociology Compass•2022

  • School choice's idealized premises and unfulfilled promises

    Open Access•Katherine K Chen, Megan R Moskop•Sociology Compass•2019

  • Interview with Boaventura de Sousa Santos

    Roger Dalea, Susan L Robertson et al.•Globalisation Societies and…•2004

  • Learning critical feminist research

    Open Access•Britta Wigginton, Michelle N Lafrance•Feminism & Psychology•2019

  • Illustrating the Value of Critical Methodologies Through Third-sector Gender Studies

    Open Access•Jennifer Dodge, Angela M Eikenberry et al.•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2021

  • The global revolution in public management

    Open Access•Donald F Kettl•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1997

  • How Do Government Grants Affect Nonprofit Financial Effectiveness? The Mediation Role of Process Accountability

    Open Access•Jeongyoon Lee, Young Joo Park et al.•Administration & Society•2023

  • How Bureaucratic Representation Affects Public Organizational Performance

    Open Access•Fangda Ding, Jiahuan Lu et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • CO‐Design ‐ing a more context‐based , pluralistic, and participatory future for public administration

    Open Access•Kayla Schwoerer, Florian Keppeler et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • Program Enterprise and Official Cooptation in the Battered Women's Shelter Movement

    Open Access•John M Johnson•American Behavioral Scientist•1981

  • The New Public Management

    Linda Kaboolian•Public Administration Review•1998

  • The Dissonance of “Doing Good

    Maureen Emerson Feit, Billie Sandberg•Public Integrity•2022

  • Toward a More Just Nonprofit Sector

    Ashley E Nickels, Kirk A Leach•Public Integrity•2021

  • Decision Biases and Heuristics Among Emergency Managers

    Open Access•Patrick S Roberts, Kris Wernstedt•The American Review of Public…•2018

  • The Collectivist Organization

    Joyce Rothschild-Whitt•American Sociological Review•1979

  • Talk Is Cheap

    Open Access•Colin Jerolmack, Shamus Khan•Sociological Methods & Research•2014

  • The Sociology of Elites

    Shamus Khan, Shamus Rahman Khan•Annual Review of Sociology•2012

  • Powered Down

    Amanda Barrett Cox•American Journal of Sociology•2021

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae