Us Foreign Policy and the Future of Democracy and Religious Freedom in Pakistan
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6129209 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Minhas Majeed Khan (0000-0002-7372-6748, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 84-86 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Review of Faith & International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1931-7743 • E-ISSN: 1557-0274 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15570274.2012.760973 |
| OpenAlex | W2065755252 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
Pakistan has received criticism for its lack of democratic institutions, the unsatisfactory response to sectarian and religious violence, its failure to protect minorities, and the highly abused Blasphemy Law. It needs to look in the mirror and make meaningful reforms, especially in regulating madrassahs. However, American efforts to promote international religious freedom (IRF) will not be successful in countries with powerful religious communities so long as there is mistrust about the US role in international affairs. To justify its IRF policies, the United States needs to focus on issues such as democratization, human rights, good governance, and poverty reduction
Blasphemy · Corporate governance · Criticism · Democracy · Democratization · Development economics · Economic freedom · Economics · Foreign policy · Good governance · Human rights · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Religious freedom · Sociology · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Religion, Society, and Development
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,8 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |