Unge norske muslimers refleksjoner rundt fenomenet ære
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6166169 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Levi Geir Eidhamar (0000-0001-6648-8959, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2017 |
| Número | 65 |
| Páginas | 123-146 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2017-02-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0108-1993 • E-ISSN: 1904-8181 |
| Editorial | Det Kgl. Bibliotek/Royal Danish Library (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.7146/rt.v0i65.25035 |
| OpenAlex | W2586566444 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 34 |
The first part of the article explores how concepts like "honor", "shame" and "guilt" are defined and described within anthropology, sociology and psychology, and highlights discourses within and between these disciplines. The second part is based on qualitative interviews with 24 young Norwegian Muslims. It analyzes their attitudes towards “honor” and “cultures of honor”– as they themselves define these concepts. How do they judge honor according to their own interpretation of Islam? How do they describe and evaluate attitudes and practices in the homeland of their parents? Do they attempt to distinguish between religion and culture in these questions? The majority scorn values and practices in cultures of honor. This is based on religion as well as pure human values. A minority believe honor is an Islamic value that contributes to high moral values. Første del av artikkelen gir en innføring i hvordan begrepene "ære", "skam" og "skyld" blir definert og beskrevet innen sosialantropologi, sosiologi og psykologi. Diskurser innenfor og mellom disiplinene blir belyst. Den andre delen bygger på kvalitative intervjuer med 24 unge norske muslimer. Her analyseres holdningene til det de selv beskrev som ærestenkning. Hvordan bedømmer de denne tenkningen ut fra egen tolkning av islam? Hva tenker de om holdninger og praksis i foreldrenes hjemland? Ønsker de å skille mellom religion og kultur i disse spørsmålene? Flertallet tok skarp avstand til ærestenkning – både på religiøst og allmennmenneskelig grunnlag. Et mindretall mente ærestekning var en islamsk verdi som bidro til høy moral
Honor · Humanities · Islam · Shame · Sociology · Theology · Value (mathematics · Islamic Thought and Society Studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Religious studies · Social Psychology
Practical Mediterraneanism
"You Can't Take the Subway to the Field!"
Freeing Anthropology from Critique
The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games
Adopting a constructivist approach to grounded theory
Informed Grounded Theory
Family Honor Killings
Social Capital And Immigrant Religion
Empathy and the Self-Absorption Paradox II
The importance of honor concerns across eight countries
The honour/shame complex revisited
Stress and Distress in Migration
Stress and Distress in Migration
Grounding cultural syndromes
Family Honor and the Forces of Change in Arab Society
Anthropology of the Mediterranean
What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences
Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions
Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior
The role of honour concerns in emotional reactions to offences
There is nothing 'honourable' about honour killings
The honour/shame complex revisited
The Lonely Crowd
The Chrysanthemum and the Sword
Shame and Conformity
Beyond Honor and Shame
Honor Thy Sister
Shame and Honour
The Homeless Mind
Considering Grounded Theory
The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory
Changing Idioms of Shame
Remembering across the border
The Mediterranean as a Category of Regional Comparison
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |