The Influence of Law in the Supreme Court’s Search-and-Seizure Jurisprudence
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6180207 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Herbert M Kritzer (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Mark J Richards (0000-0002-0669-7879, Grand Valley State University) |
| Año | 2005 |
| Volumen | 33 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 33-55 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2005-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | American Politics Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1532-673X • E-ISSN: 1552-3373 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1532673x04264987 |
| OpenAlex | W2149735198 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 20 |
| Referencias citadas | 17 |
In this research note/replication, we apply the construct of jurisprudential regimes as described in our recent article to the jurisprudential area of search and seizure. Given the centrality of this area of Supreme Court decision making in the core studies supporting the attitudinal model, replicating our analysis of the jurisprudential regime construct in this area provides an important test of the concept. Our results produce strong support for the proposition that post-Mapp decision making can be separated into distinct regimes, with a set of important cases decided in 1983-1984 demarcating the regimes. The predictors of decisions in the two periods are consistent with the types of changes one would expect the regime shift to produce. Our findings challenge the attitudinalists’proposition that there is at best negligible statistical evidence that law influences Supreme Court decision making
Centrality · Epistemology · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Political science · Proposition · Search and seizure · Sociology · Statistics · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Mathematics
Preferências, Estratégias e Motivações
The Evolving View of the Law and Judicial Decision‐Making
Rules, Standards, and Lower Court Decisions
Deferring, Deliberating, or Dodging Review
Law's Allure and an Interbranch Perspective on Law and Politics
What’s in a Name
An Informal and Limited Alliance”
Taking and Testing Jurisprudential Regimes Seriously
The Nature of Legal Change on the U.S. Supreme Court
Reconsidering the Impact of Jurisprudential Regimes
Collegial Influence and Judicial Voting Change
Legal Constraints on Supreme Court Decision Making
Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals
Endogenous Jurisprudential Regimes
Culture and Legal Policy Punctuation in the Supreme Court's Gender Discrimination Cases
Judicial Behavior and the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Revolution
Latino Judges on the Federal District Court
Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts
The Constraint of Law
Does Chevron Matter
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited
Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices
Taking Rights Seriously
Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers
The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices
Marshalling the Court
Measuring Change on the Supreme Court
Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking
Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically
Political Jurisprudence, the "New Institutionalism," and the Future of Public Law
Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making
| Obras citantes distintas | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2022 (17) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 19 |