A spontaneous stereotype content model
Taxonomy, properties, and prediction
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6206524 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gandalf Nicolas (0000-0001-8215-1758), Xuechunzi Bai (0000-0002-2277-5451), Susan T Fiske (0000-0002-1693-3425) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 123 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 1243-1263 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315 |
| Editorial | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/pspa0000312 |
| PMID | 35511560 |
| OpenAlex | W4229005495 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 22 |
1,470) show the utility of spontaneous stereotypes, compared to traditional, prompted, scale-based stereotypes. Using natural language processing text analyses, Study 1 shows the most common spontaneous stereotype dimensions for salient social groups. Our results confirm existing stereotype models' dimensions, while uncovering a significant prevalence of dimensions that these models do not cover, such as Health, Appearance, and Deviance. The SSCM also characterizes the valence, direction, and accessibility of reported dimensions (e.g., Ability stereotypes are mostly positive, but Morality stereotypes are mostly negative; Sociability stereotypes are provided later than Ability stereotypes in a sequence of open-ended responses). Studies 2 and 3 check the robustness of these findings by: using a larger sample of social groups, varying time pressure, and diversifying analytical strategies. Study 3 also establishes the value of spontaneous stereotypes: compared to scales alone, open-ended measures improve predictions of attitudes toward social groups. Improvement in attitude prediction results partially from a more comprehensive taxonomy as well as a construct we refer to as stereotype representativeness: the prevalence of a stereotype dimension in perceivers' spontaneous beliefs about a social group. Finally, Study 4 examines how the taxonomy provides additional insight into stereotypes' influence on decision-making in socially relevant scenarios. Overall, spontaneous content broadens our understanding of stereotyping and intergroup relations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
Cognition · Developmental psychology · Epistemology · Morality · PsycINFO · Social cognition · Stereotype (UML) · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Multiple Meritocracies
A Tutorial on Representational Similarity Analysis for Research in Social Cognition
Spontaneous Content of Impressions of Naturalistic Face Photographs
Scores
The baggage and the benefits that travel with the F word
Does the Gender of Doctors Change a Patient’s Perception
“If Immoral Then Unable”
Construal Level Stereotypes
All You Nonconformists Are (Not) All Alike
Prototypes of Victims of Workplace Harassment
Unconstrained Descriptions of Facebook Profile Pictures Support High-Dimensional Models of Impression Formation
Moral Stereotyping
Computational Evidence for the Two-Dimensional Structure of Social Evaluation
Sex Wars and Terf Wars
Dissecting Whiteness
How does the matching relationship between negative events and destination image influence potential tourists’ visit intentions? The moderating role of intolerance of uncertainty
We need to move beyond rating scales, white faces and adult perceivers
Stereotypes about Muslims in the Netherlands
Spontaneous Stereotypes About Individuals With Mental Illnesses
Leaders or Villains? The Role of Corruption in Shaping the Stereotypes of Politicians
How the country of education affects migrant doctors' acceptance among their patients
How Do We Perceive Our Relations With Animals? The Predominance of Relational Nature and Physical Capacity
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 7,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 21 |