Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Better Government, Better Science

The Promise of and Challenges Facing the Evidence-Informed Policy Movement

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6233080
AutoresJ Bowers (0000-0002-4048-1166, Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA), Paul F Testa (Department of Political Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA), Paul Testa (0000-0001-9111-3796, Brown University)
Año2019
Volumen22
Número1
Páginas521-542
Fecha de publicación2019-05-11
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAnnual Review of Political Science (BOOK_SERIES)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1094-2939 • E-ISSN: 1545-1577
EditorialAnnual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-124041
OpenAlexW2916554545
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas16
Referencias citadas95

Collaborations between the academy and governments promise to improve the lives of people, the operations of government, and our understanding of human behavior and public policy. This review shows that the evidence-informed policy movement consists of two main threads: ( a) an effort to invent new policies using insights from the social and behavioral science consensus about human behavior and institutions and ( b) an effort to evaluate the success of governmental policies using transparent and high-integrity research designs such as randomized controlled trials. We argue that the problems of each approach may be solved or at least well addressed by teams that combine the two. We also suggest that governmental actors ought to want to learn about why a new policy works as much as they want to know that the policy works. We envision a future evidence-informed public policy practice that ( a) involves cross-sector collaborations using the latest theory plus deep contextual knowledge to design new policies, ( b) applies the latest insights in research design and statistical inference for causal questions, and ( c) is focused on assessing explanations as much as on discovering what works. The evidence-informed public policy movement is a way that new data, new questions, and new collaborators can help political scientists improve our theoretical understanding of politics and also help our policy partners to improve the practice of government itself

Evidence-based policy · Government (linguistics · Policy studies · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Public relations · Sociology · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Law · Public Administration

  • Salient and contested scientific evidence in debates over sustainable transformation

    Open Access•Oliver Truffer, Benjamin Hofmann et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Supporting frontline workers in the biodiversity crisis by empowering and enabling practitioners to embrace conservation evidence

    Open Access•Steven J Cooke, Kevin A Adeli et al.•Socio-Ecological Practice Research•2026

  • Co-producing field experiments in public management research

    Ulrich Thy Jensen, Ole Helby Petersen et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Institutional fragmentation in United States protected area agencies and its impact on budget processes

    Open Access•Liza Khmara, Michael Touchton•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2024

  • Behavioral Implementation and Compliance of Anti-Epidemic Policy in the Covid-19 Crisis

    Open Access•Chengzhe Fu, Liao Liao et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Human Biomonitoring Data Enables Evidence-Informed Policy to Reduce Internal Exposure to Persistent Organic Compounds

    Open Access•Ann Colles, Dries Coertjens et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Challenges and Prospects for Evidence-Informed Policy in Criminology

    Open Access•Thomas G Blomberg, Jennifer E Copp et al.•Annual Review of Criminology•2023

  • Blocked and “Unblocked” Learning

    Open Access•Thenia Vagionaki•European Policy Analysis•2025

  • Who counts in civically engaged research? Rethinking expertise and authority in politics

    Ankushi Mitra, Jill Mcnew-Birren et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • Policy actors’ perceptions of qualitative research in policymaking

    Rebecca S Natow•Evidence & Policy•2020

  • Communicating the Evidence

    Open Access•Kayla Schwoerer•The American Review of Public…•2026

  • Learning from Local Government Research Partnerships in a Fragmented Political Setting

    Open Access•Molly Mullin•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Buying Evidence? Policy Research as a Presidential Commodity

    Rachel Augustine Potter•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Engaged Pluralism

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • Research Impact Through Matchmaking (Ritm)

    Open Access•Adam Seth Levine•PS Political Science & Politics•2020

  • Why Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers? Evidence from a Field Experiment

    Open Access•Adam Seth Levine•PS Political Science & Politics•2020

  • The Rationalizing Voter

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Charles S Taber•Rationalizing Voter•2013

  • Evidence-Based Policy

    Nancy Cartwright, Jeremy Hardie•Evidence-based policy•2012

  • Information, Accountability, and Cumulative Learning

    Open Access•Michael Humphreys, Thad Dunning et al.•Information, Accountability, and…•2019

  • Experimental Foundations of Political Science

    Donald Kinder, Thomas R Palfrey•Experimental foundations of…•1993

  • The Role of Application Assistance and Information in College Decisions

    Eric Bettinger, Eric P Bettinger et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2012

  • Behavioral Economics

    Richard H Thaler•American Economic Review•2016

  • The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial

    Open Access•Karla Hemming, Timothy Haines et al.•BMJ•2015

  • Do Defaults Save Lives?

    Open Access•E Johnson, Daniel Goldstein•Science•2003

  • Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design

    Open Access•John Sweller•Learning and Instruction•1994

  • Is Ego Depletion Real? An Analysis of Arguments

    Open Access•Malte Friese, David D Loschelder et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2019

  • Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials.

    Stephen W Raudenbush•Psychological Methods•1997

  • A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect

    Open Access•Evan C Carter, Lilly M Kofler et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2015

  • An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning

    Open Access•Magda Osman•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2004

  • Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?

    Open Access•Shlomo Benartzi, John Beshears et al.•Psychological Science•2017

  • Doing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others

    Open Access•Emily Pronin, Christopher Y Olivola et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2008

  • How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?

    Open Access•CAROL H WEISS•Evaluation Review•1997

  • Reconsidering the Rational Public

    Open Access•James H Kuklinski, Paul J Quirk•Elements of Reason•2000

  • Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests

    Stefan Wager, Susan Athey•Journal of the American…•2018

  • Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults

    Open Access•Craig R M Mckenzie, Michael J Liersch et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • Individual differences in reasoning

    Open Access•Keith E Stanovich, Richard F West•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2000

  • Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation

    Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•The Annals of Applied Statistics•2013

  • The Power of Suggestion

    Brigitte C Madrian, Dennis F Shea•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2001

  • On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9

    Jerzy Splawa-Neyman, D M Dabrowska et al.•Statistical Science•1990

  • Evidence-based medicine

    Open Access•David L Sackett•Seminars in Perinatology•1997

  • How open science helps researchers succeed

    Open Access•Erin C McKiernan, Peter Bourne et al.•eLife•2016

  • Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1991

  • Status quo bias in decision making

    Open Access•William Samuelson, Richard Zeckhauser•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1988

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Evidence based medicine

    Open Access•David L Sackett, William Rosenberg et al.•BMJ•1996

  • Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition

    Jonathan St B T Evans•Annual Review of Psychology•2008

  • Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

    Open Access•Jonathan St B T Evans, Keith E Stanovich•Perspectives on Psychological…•2013

  • Agendas, alternatives, and public policies

    John W Kingdon•Agendas, alternatives, and public…•1995

  • An Analysis of Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein’s Nudge

    Mark Egan•An Analysis of Richard H. Thaler…•2017

  • Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality

    Open Access•Rebecca B Morton, Kenneth C Williams•Experimental Political Science…•2010

  • Libertarian Paternalism

    Richard H Thaler, Cass R Sunstein•American Economic Review•2003

  • How Policies Make Citizens

    Andrea Louise Campbell•How Policies Make Citizens•2003

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Open Access•Roger Tourangeau, Lance J Rips et al.•Psychology of Survey Response•2000

  • Protecting Soldiers and Mothers

    Open Access•T Skocpol•Protecting Soldiers and Mothers•1995

  • The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy

    Open Access•Eldar Shafir•Behavioral Foundations of Public…•2013

  • The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology

    Donald Collier, J M Box-Steffensmeier et al.•The Oxford handbook of political…•2008

  • Stylized Facts in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Daniel Hirschman•Sociological Science•2016

  • A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009

    Open Access•Chris L S Coryn, Lindsay A Noakes et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2011

  • The Fairy Godmother—and Her Warts

    Open Access•CAROL H WEISS, Erin Murphy‐graham et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2008

  • Getting Out the Vote With Evaluative Thinking

    Open Access•Yosef Bhatti, Jens Olav Dahlgaard et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2015

  • Debate

    Open Access•Daniel M Hausman, Brynn F Welch et al.•Journal of Political Philosophy•2009

  • Dual-process theories of decision-making

    Isabelle Brocas, Juan D Carrillo•Journal of Economic Psychology•2014

  • Statistical Models and Shoe Leather

    David A Freedman•Sociological Methodology•1991

  • Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem

    Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1990

  • Save More TomorrowTM

    Richard H Thaler, Shlomo Benartzi•Journal of Political Economy•2004

  • Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems

    F R Baumgartner, Bryan D Jones•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • Fishing, Commitment, and Communication

    Open Access•Michael Humphreys, Macartan Humphreys et al.•Political Analysis•2013

  • The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship

    Open Access•Suzanne Mettler, Joe So•Perspectives on Politics•2004

  • The Challenge of Big Data and Data Science

    Henry E Brady•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

  • Standard Operating Procedures

    Open Access•Winston Lin, Winston T Lin et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2016

  • Framing Theory

    D Chong, James N Druckman•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • Heuristic Decision Making

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Wolfgang Gaissmaier•Annual Review of Psychology•2010

  • On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2015

  • Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron

    Cass R Sunstein, Richard H Thaler•The University of Chicago Law…•2003

  • Behavioral economics and climate change policy

    Open Access•John M Gowdy•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2008

  • The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • The Role of Behavioral Economics in Evidence-Based Policymaking

    Open Access•William J Congdon, Maya Shankar•The Annals of the American…•2018

  • Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials

    Open Access•Angus Deaton, Nancy Cartwright•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • Should social science be more solution-oriented

    Open Access•Duncan J Watts•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

  • Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control

    Martin S Hagger, Chantelle Wood et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies

    Open Access•Abhijit Banerjee, Rukmini Banerji et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2017

  • The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Donald P Green et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green•American Political Science Review•2000

Obras citantes distintas16
Citas por año2,67
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2026 (7)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 16
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae