Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Explaining the resolution of the China‐Vietnam conflict

How relevant is Zartman's “ripeness theory

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6233598
AutoresRamses Amer (Umeå University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2004
Volumen12
Número2
Páginas109-125
Fecha de publicación2004-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAsian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0218-5377 • E-ISSN: 1750-7812
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02185370408434244
OpenAlexW2028711411
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas23

This article examines the relevance of Zartman's “ripeness theory” to explain the resolution of the China‐Vietnam conflict. It analyses the core concepts of this theoretical approach to the study of conflict resolution, and evaluates the explanatory value of this approach for understanding the resolution of conflict in specific cases such as the China‐Vietnam conflict. The article identifies three core concepts in this theory, including “hurting stalemate”, “ripe moment”, and “ripe for resolution”. But from the analysis of the China‐Vietnam conflict, it could not discern any of these concepts or stages in the process of conflict resolution in this particular case. Thus, it concludes that Zartman's theoretical approach does not have an explanatory value for the case of the resolution of the Sino‐Vietnamese conflict

China · Conflict resolution · Economics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Relevance (law · Resolution (logic · Ripeness · Sociology · Stalemate · Value (mathematics · Vietnamese · Computer Science · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy

  • Ripe for resolution

    I William Zartman•Ripe for resolution•1989

  • Soviet Relations with India and Vietnam

    Open Access•Ramesh Thakur, Ramesh Chandra Thakur et al.•Soviet Relations with India and…•1992

  • A Summer Cruise to Nowhere China and the Vietnamese Chinese in Perspective

    Michael R Godley, Michael Godley•The Australian Journal of Chinese…•1980

  • Modern Chinese Warfare, 1795-1989

    Bruce A Elleman•Modern Chinese Warfare, 1795-1989•2005

  • The Kampuchean‐Vietnamese Conflict

    Stephen P Heder•Southeast Asian affairs•1979

  • Comrade plus brother

    Carlyle A Thayer•The Pacific Review•1992

  • Vietnam and Its Neighbours

    Ramses Amer•Contemporary Southeast Asia•1995

  • Vietnam and Its Neighbours

    Ramses Amer•Contemporary Southeast Asia•1995

  • Assessing Sino‐ Vietnamese Relations through the Management of Contentious Issues

    Ramses Amer•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2004

  • The Sino-Vietnamese Conflict

    Donald S Zagoria, Eugene K Lawson•Foreign Affairs•1985

  • The Third Indochina Conflict

    Bernard K Gordon•Foreign Affairs•1986

  • Conflict and Resolution

    Open Access•I William Zartman•The Annals of the American…•1991

  • The "New Type" of Sino-Soviet Relations

    John W Garver•Asian Survey•1989

  • The Independent Vietnamese. Vietnamese Communism Between Russia and China, 1965-1969

    Carlyle A Thayer, W R Smyser•Pacific Affairs•1982

  • Red Brotherhood at War. Indochina Since the Fall of Saigon

    Carlyle A Thayer, Grant Evans et al.•Pacific Affairs•1986

  • China's War With Vietnam, 1979

    Harlan W Jencks, King C Chen•Pacific Affairs•1988

  • The Third Indochina Conflict

    Douglas A Ro, Douglas A Ross et al.•Pacific Affairs•1982

  • Sino-Vietnamese Normalization in the Light of the Crisis of the Late 1970s

    Ramses Amer•Pacific Affairs•1994

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae