Solving the Riddle of Industrial Policy
A Comparative Perspective
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6234887 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jenny Stewart (0000-0001-8804-8196, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1996 |
| Volumen | 31 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 25-36 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1996-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Australian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10361149651256 |
| OpenAlex | W2115377485 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
Industrial policy would appear to be fertile ground for the application of evaluative comparison, that is, the use of comparative methods to elicit principles for policy improvement. Comparative methods have been used, although often on a highly selective basis, to support or rebut arguments about targeted government intervention in industry. This paper argues that it is only when industrial policy is reconceptualised as a system of incentives rather than as a set of allocative decisions that evaluative comparison comes into its own. By developing and applying the 'most different' method of comparison, it is possible to discern the key elements of successful industrial policy in a form which can be used to bring about practical improvement in any given country
Allocative efficiency · Economic system · Economics · Government (linguistics · Incentive · Industrial organization · Industrial policy · International trade · Law and economics · Management science · Microeconomics · Neoclassical economics · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Positive economics · Public economics · Set (abstract data type · Computer Science · Regional Development and Policy
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,16 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2001 - 2015 (15) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |