Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The High Court of Australia and political science

A revised historiography and new research agenda

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6234986
AutoresRyan Turner (0009-0004-1044-5828), Ryan James Turner (Film Independent, autor de correspondencia)
Año2015
Volumen50
Número2
Páginas347-364
Fecha de publicación2015-04-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAustralian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10361146.2015.1006165
OpenAlexW2114391171
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas48

The judiciary has not been the subject of sustained scrutiny within the political science discipline. The High Court plays a central role in the Australian political system, however, and the exercise of judicial power has far reaching consequences for the legislative and executive branches of government. This \narticle presents a historiography of the study of the High Court by political scientists, using Helen Irving’s ‘The Constitution and the judiciary’ as a foil. In order to foster cross-disciplinary study and research within the political science discipline, this article concludes by setting out a new research agenda for the future study of the High Court and the law by political scientists. This research agenda provides new insights into (among other topics) how judges exercise power and the changing relationship between the judiciary and the legislative and executive branches

Constitution · Discipline · Historiography · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Presidency · Scrutiny · Subject (documents · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Public Administration

  • Organised Interests and the Courts

    Open Access•Ruth Parsons, Darren Halpin•Australian Journal of Politics &…•2022

  • Judges, ‘common sense’ and judicial cognition

    Kylie Burns•Griffith Law Review•2016

  • Australian Capitalism

    H W Arndt, John Playford et al.•The Australian Quarterly•1972

  • Judicial Interaction on the Latham Court

    Open Access•Russell Smyth•Australian Journal of Politics &…•2001

  • Oxford Companion to Australian Politics

    Brian Galligan, Winsome Roberts•Oxford Companion to Australian…•2007

  • Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    Ryan A Malphurs, Ryan Malphurs•Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme…•2013

  • The Hollow Hope

    Gerald N Rosenberg, Gerald Rosenberg•The Hollow Hope•2008

  • High Court Review 2007–08

    Anika Gauja•Australian Journal of Political…•2009

  • Legitimating judicial review

    Brian Galligan•Journal of Australian Studies•1981

  • Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments

    Ann L Bryan•Rhetoric and Public Affairs•2015

  • High Court Review 2009

    Anika Gauja•Australian Journal of Political…•2010

  • High Court Review 2001

    Haig Patapan•Australian Journal of Political…•2002

  • High Court Review 2004

    Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2005

  • High Court Review 2002

    Haig Patapan•Australian Journal of Political…•2003

  • High Court review 2003

    Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2004

  • High court review 2005

    Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2006

  • High Court Review 2010

    Anika Gauja, Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2011

  • High Court Review 2006

    Paul Kildea, Katharine Gelber•Australian Journal of Political…•2007

  • The Hollow Hope

    K L Scheppele, Gerald N Rosenberg et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1992

  • Equality and Authority

    Jan A Mol, Hans Mol et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1972

  • Australian Government Today

    Eleanore Bushnell, Geoffrey Sawer•The Western Political Quarterly•1962

  • Judicial Policy-Making

    George Andrew Hopper, Glendon Schubert•The Western Political Quarterly•1969

  • Legal System and Lawyers' Reasonings

    A H Campbell, Julius Stone•The Philosophical Quarterly•1966

  • Political ideology on the high court

    Glendon Schubert•Politics•1968

  • Judges and policy on the Latham court

    Roger Douglas, R N Douglas•Politics•1969

  • Federalism

    Ann Scott, A D Scott et al.•Economica•1954

  • Judicial Behavior

    Hilliard A Gardiner, G Schubert•The American Journal of…•1965

  • Towards Juristocracy

    Open Access•Vlad Perju•Modern Law Review•2005

  • Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia

    Open Access•David L Weiden•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • The Consensual Norm on the High Court of Australia

    Open Access•Paresh Kumar Narayan, Russell Smyth•International Political Science…•2005

  • Historical Consensual Norms in the High Court

    Russell Smyth•Australian Journal of Political…•2002

  • Group decision making on appellate panels

    Theodore Eisenberg, Talia Fisher et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2013

  • The Political Origins of the New Constitutionalism

    Ran Hirschl, Hirschl et al.•Indiana Journal of Global Legal…•2004

  • Australian Government and Politics. An Introductory Survey

    Michael Gunn, J D B Miller et al.•British Journal of Sociology•1956

  • Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior

    Richard D Schwartz, Glendon A Schubert et al.•American Sociological Review•1960

  • Politics of the High Court

    Alan C Cairns, Brian Galligan•Pacific Affairs•1988

  • A Handbook of Australian Government and Politics, 1890-1964

    Open Access•Malcolm Mackerras, Caroline Hughes et al.•Labour History•1969

  • Law in Books and Law in Action

    Peter Bradley•Social Forces•1934

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,2
Intervalo de citas2016 - 2022 (7)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae