Fighting Fire with Fire
The Implications of (Not) Going Negative in a Multiparty Election Campaign
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6237225 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jason Roy (0000-0003-4237-0504, Wilfrid Laurier University, autor de correspondencia), Christopher Alcantara (0000-0001-6089-1114, Western University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2016 |
| Volumen | 49 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 473-497 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2016-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423916000548 |
| OpenAlex | W2544967720 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
This paper draws upon data collected from an online voting experiment to test the implications of “going negative” in a multiparty election campaign. Specifically, we investigate two sets of questions: First, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to the tone (positive/negative) of their election campaign? Second, does the attention and vote share that candidates receive vary according to whether or not all candidates engage in similar (positive/negative) campaigns? While studies of “negative campaigning” have been prominent in the American context, our work builds upon this literature by using an experimental design to test for their effects in a multiparty setting
Advertising · Business · Context (archaeology · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Test (biology · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · History · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
How Voters Decide
Negativity in Democratic Politics
In Defense of Negativity
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
The Perception of Political Advertising During an Election Campaign
Is There a Cost to Convenience? An Experimental Comparison of Data Quality in Laboratory and Online Studies
Negative Campaigning across Different Communication Channels
Web Sponsorship and Campaign Effects
Exploring the Consequences of Negative Political Advertising for Liberal Democracy
Just ignore or counterattack? On the effects of different strategies for dealing with political attacks
When the gloves come off
Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns
Attack and Response in Political Campaigns
The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns
What's Good for the Goose is Bad for the Gander
Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System
Examining the Possible Corrosive Impact of Negative Advertising on Citizens' Attitudes toward Politics
What Voters Do
Survival of the Fittest
How Negativity Can Increase and Decrease Voter Turnout
News, Politics, and Negativity
Accentuating the Negative
Negative Advertising and Voter Choice
The Relationship Between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context
Choosing the enemy
Negative Campaigning in No-Cabinet Alternation Systems
What really matters is which camp goes dirty
When the Stakes Are High
Negative Campaigning
The Dimensions of Negative Messages
Ideological proximity and valence competition. Negative campaigning through allegation of corruption in the Italian legislative arena from 1946 to 1994
Raising the tone? The impact of 'positive' and 'negative' campaigning on voting in the 2007 Scottish Parliament election
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,57 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2024 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |