After the Break-up

Institutional Design in Transitional States

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6244136
AutoresPauline Jones Luong (0000-0002-1744-2097, Yale University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2000
Volumen33
Número5
Páginas563-592
Fecha de publicación2000-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaComparative Political Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0010-4140 • E-ISSN: 1552-3829
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0010414000033005001
OpenAlexW2165274459
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas25
Referencias citadas22

This article integrates historical and rational choice approaches to institutional origin and change to explain the establishment of electoral systems in three former Soviet Central Asian republics—Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. It argues that institutions designed under transitional circumstances are products of the interaction between the preceding historical and institutional setting and the dynamic uncertainty that surrounds them. Strategic actors engaged in the process of institutional design use both contexts in order to assess the degree to and direction in which their relative power is changing. They then negotiate accordingly so as to attain their preferred institutional outcomes. Central Asia's electoral systems in particular can be best understood as the product of very similar and long-standing regional power struggles being played out under varying dynamic and uncertain conditions

Central asia · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Electoral system · Institutional change · International trade · Negotiation · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Product (mathematics · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Russia and Soviet political economy