Two-Round Electoral Systems and Democracy

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6246162
AutoresSarah Birch (0000-0001-6457-1310, University of Essex, autor de correspondencia)
Año2003
Volumen36
Número3
Páginas319-344
Fecha de publicación2003-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaComparative Political Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0010-4140 • E-ISSN: 1552-3829
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0010414002250678
OpenAlexW1970507680
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas24
Referencias citadas41

Taking as its point of departure a little-noted recent increase in use of two-round electoral systems in parliamentary elections, this article assesses the impact of such systems on democratic performance. It argues that the possibility of holding a second round of voting is a destabilizing factor that inhibits democratic development and encourages the use of nonelectoral means of exercising power. This is because the institution of the double ballot works to fragment the party system by establishing district-specific strategic incentives and by diminishing the element of uncertainty that is key to securing cooperation by important political actors. This proposition is tested on a data set of all states that as of 1 January 1999 held elections to the lower houses of their national assemblies, as well as on a smaller database of democratizing countries

Ballot · Democracy · Economics · Element (criminal law · Incentive · Institution · Microeconomics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Proportional representation · Proposition · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies