The future Germany and the future of Nato
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6263264 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Emil Kirchner (0000-0002-5253-4480, University of Essex), Emil J Kirchner, James Sperling (University of Akron) |
| Año | 1992 |
| Volumen | 1 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 50-77 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1992-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | German Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0964-4008 • E-ISSN: 1743-8993 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09644009208404279 |
| OpenAlex | W2055054236 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
The events of 1989 have raised questions about NATO's future and purpose. Two different views are held by Germany and the USA. The Germans seek the political and economic unification of the EC, the construction of a European pillar within a demilitarised NATO, and a pan‐European collective security system. In contrast, the Americans seek to preserve NATO as a military alliance responsible for western European security under American leadership and to equip NATO with competences extending beyond the NA TO area. Whilst insisting on greater western European burden sharing and security coordination, the Americans see the roles of the CSCE and the WEU as complementary to NATO's
Alliance · Collective security · Foreign policy · International relations · Pillar · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Transatlantic relations · Unification · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Engineering · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Military and Defense Studies
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1996 - 2014 (19) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |