Loquocentric Society and its Critics
The Case of Habermas
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6266159 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kenneth Minogue (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1986 |
| Volumen | 21 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 338-361 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1986-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Government and Opposition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0017-257X • E-ISSN: 1477-7053 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1986.tb00705.x |
| OpenAlex | W2100929350 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
What is politics the outcomeof? The common answers to this question would invoke such ideas as power and interests. I want to argue that political events, particularly in the modern world, are the outcome of nothing else but politics itself. They emerge rhetorically, from public talk, and nothing more fundamental can be found. A society which can be validly characterized in this way may suitably be called ‘loquocentric’, or talk-centred. The odd thing is that much of the most acute exploration of this idea has taken place in a distorted form - in acamera obscuru, as it were - in ideological writing, which is dedicated to such fundamental determinants of the course of events as race, nation, gender and class. The work of Jurgen Habermas is particularly striking. Before I consider it, however, let me sketch out the thesis that modern politics is essentially loquocentric
Aesthetics · Class (philosophy · Epistemology · Ideology · Nothing · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sketch · Social science · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,03 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1991 - 1991 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |