Reflections on the economics and politics of international economic organizations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6268898
AutoresLawrence B Krause, Joseph S Nye
Año1975
Volumen29
Número1
Páginas323-342
Fecha de publicación1975-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Organization (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0020-8183 • E-ISSN: 1531-5088
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0020818300017975
OpenAlexW2123366040
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14
Referencias citadas9

International organizations, it is sometimes said, are always designed to prevent the last war. An analogous problem besets economic institutions. The inability of some existing international economic organizations to deal with the current problems in their domains is all too apparent. Two of the institutional pillars of the postwar Bretton Woods system, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. (GATT), were shaken in 1971 and are still suffering from severe malaise. The political and economic conditions that led to their formation at the end of the Second World War have changed, calling into question the political and intellectual foundation upon which they were constructed. In the aftermath of the 1973 energy crisis, meetings of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and a special session of the General Assembly have been the scene of demands by poor countries for a new economic order, but the meaning of the phrase has been ambiguous and the formula has impeded rather than promoted agreement

Economics · General assembly · Institutional economics · International relations · International trade · Meaning (existential · Neoclassical economics · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Finance · International Development and Aid · Law