De-Centering, Not Discarding, the “Isms”

Some Friendly Amendments

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6272811
AutoresRounak Sil (0000-0001-9502-3122, University of Pennsylvania), Rudra Sil, Peter J Katzenstein (Cornell University)
Año2011
Volumen55
Número2
Páginas481-485
Fecha de publicación2011-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00657.x
OpenAlexW1873800284
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas17
Referencias citadas9

The authors are sympathetic to much of David Lake's argument in his critique of paradigmatic 'isms' in the field. However, they also seek to qualify his diagnosis of the problem and critically assess some of his prescriptions and his efforts to manage epistemological divides in the field. In the process, the authors also clarify certain aspects of 'analytic eclecticism

Argument (complex analysis · Eclecticism · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Process (computing · Sociology · Computer Science · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Critical Realism in Sociology · Management and Organizational Studies · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy