A Methodological Critique of a Test of the Effects of the Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6284290 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Philip A Schrodt (0000-0003-3495-4198, University of Kansas, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1990 |
| Volumen | 34 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 745-755 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1990-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022002790034004008 |
| OpenAlex | W2077276277 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 7 |
The test of the effects of the “Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field” by Orme-Johnson et al. which appeared in the December 1988 issue of the Journal of Conflict Resolution contains several substantial methodological problems. First, the measurement of the critical independent variable governing whether an effect should be found does not correspond to the most obvious interpretation of the theory, an interpretation used in later studies of the same theory. If population is measured using geographical radius rather than political boundaries, the observed effects should not have occurred, yet the study finds them anyway. In addition, the study did not adequately control for the possibility of reverse causation (the effects causing the treatment) or properly test for the possibility of spurious relationships. Because validation of the theory would contradict virtually the whole of contemporary understanding of causality in social behavior, insistence on such additional measurement specifications, controls, and statistical tests prior to publication would not have constituted unreasonable “censorship” of the research in question
Causality (physics · Causation · Economics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Interpretation (philosophy · Physics · Population · Positive economics · Sociology · Spurious relationship · Statistics · Test (biology · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Computer Science · Cultural Differences and Values · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Social Psychology
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2001 - 2022 (22) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |