Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

TM or Not TM

A Comment on “International Peace Project in the Middle East

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6284807
AutoresRobert Duval (West Virginia University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1988
Volumen32
Número4
Páginas813-817
Fecha de publicación1988-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022002788032004010
OpenAlexW2267936649
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas6

For a (now formerly) anonymous reviewer of the previous article, International Peace Project in the Middle East: The Effects of the Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field, the manuscript presents somewhat of a dilemma. On the one hand, the claimed theoretical basis for the activity described, and the results purported in the analysis, are anathema to one who considers himself a strong advocate of the application of scientific method in the social sciences. On the other hand, both the level of exposition and the application of statistical methods for hypothesis testing are commensurate with this reviewer's standards for scientific research. The disturbing aspect of this piece is not that it is in print, but that it got there via the very mechanism that, one would suppose, should have screened it out-an anonymous peer review and editorial process that evaluates manuscripts based upon unarticulated but widely accepted professional standards for scientific research. There are, I feel, a number of lessons in this. Some of these lessons are but reminders of the basic elements of philosophy of science one encounters in graduate school but pays little heed to in the everyday practice of research. Others are more practical matters suggesting caution concerning our willingness to accept results reported in more conventional literature. A brief look at the implications of this article for research will, in the eyes of this reviewer, be instructive. What I find of value in this piece has little, if anything, to do with the substance of the article. For this reviewer, the primary lesson learned is that if a piece this unconventional can be supported with measurement and method, then there is perhaps a notable volume of research of a

Business · Political science · Indian History and Philosophy · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East

  • How Not to Be Lakatos Intolerant

    Colin Elman, Miriam Fendius Elman•International Studies Quarterly•2002

  • The Effects of the Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field

    Open Access•David W Orme-Johnson, David W Orme‐johnson et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1990

  • The Data Puzzle

    Herbert M Kritzer•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge

    Open Access•Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave•Criticism and the Growth of…•1970

  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn et al.•Physics Today•1963

  • Military Spending in the United States, Soviet Union, and the People's Republic of China

    Open Access•Thomas R Cusack, Michael D Ward•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1981

  • Expectations and Arms Races

    Stephen J Majeski•American Journal of Political…•1985

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,08
Intervalo de citas1990 - 2002 (13)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae