Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6318239 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John Medearis (0000-0003-3413-7067, University of California, Riverside, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 4 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 576-578 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Perspectives on Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537592706310365 |
| OpenAlex | W2153162949 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 35 |
Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science. Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005. 608p. $35.00. Critics have berated the Perestroika movement since it erupted in 2000 for engaging in academic politics before improving the tools available for apprehending the political world. But the guiding thread of any group's thinking generally arises out of its common activities, as Karl Mannheim pointed out. So it is no surprise that Perestroika, as a movement of disaffected political scientists, would coalesce first as an attempt to storm the discipline's citadels in the name of “methodological pluralism.” Some years later, however, we are in a better position to assess the principles implicated in the movement and its slogan, a judgment now enabled by the publication of Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe
Media studies · Political science · Politics · Slogan · Sociology · Surprise · Law · Philosophy · Political Science Research and Education · Religious studies
Debates Y Progreso en La Ciencia Política Contemporánea
The Rebels' Yell
On the Relevance of The Present State of the Study of Politics (Round Table)
The Politics of Studying Politics
A Ciência na Ciência Política brasileira
From Sociological Interpretation to Political Science
A Preference for Selfish Preferences
Politics is too important to be left to political scientists
Choices for Chinese Political Science
The Perestroika Movement in American Political Science and its Lessons for Chinese Political Studies
La iniciativa da-rt en la ciencia política estadounidense
The higher education impact agenda, scientific realism and policy change
Methodology Matters
Reply to Todd Landman
Description as the basis for conceptualization and inquiry
What Happens at the Journal Office Stays at the Journal Office
Some Modest Proposals for Improving Business Ethics from Primarily an Aristotelian Perspective
Writing Russia's Future
Power, politics, and the development of political science in the Americas
Greatly exaggerated’
A Different Europe is Possible
Reflexivity and Temporality in Researching Violent Settings
Engaged Pluralism
Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations
Language and Conflict
The Golden Mean and the Golden Hammer
Public Political Narratives
Political Science and the Public Sphere Today
Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics
No Method to the Comparative Politics Madness
Beyond Parochialism and Domestic Preoccupation
Interpretation and political science in Australia
Politics and Political Science
The Institutionalization of Author Production and the Performance Imperative as an Ontological Fiction
Reading the Far Right Beyond Self-Righteousness
| Obras citantes distintas | 35 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,84 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2024 (18) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 33 |