The Political Theology of Prerogative
The Jurisprudential Miracle in Liberal Constitutional Thought
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6325294 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Clement Fatovic (0009-0008-0755-706X, Florida International University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2008 |
| Volumen | 6 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 487-501 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2008-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Perspectives on Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537592708081243 |
| OpenAlex | W2106528999 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 37 |
Liberalism ordinarily requires authorities to provide a full public account of their actions so that citizens can critically evaluate those actions for themselves, but in times of life-threatening emergency, liberalism sometimes evinces a willingness to place unquestioning faith in executives who promise to deliver it from such evil. In doing so, liberalism violates its moral and epistemological commitment to “makepublic useof one's reason in all matters.” This article uses the framework provided by Carl Schmitt's concept of political theology to analyze the reluctance of liberals to ask questions of the executive in times of danger and uncertainty. That framework helps explain how both the content and the structure of liberal thought can shift in a theological (and specifically theistic) direction when faced with an emergency. This article demonstrates that the quasi-religious rhetoric sometimes used to justify expansions of executive power in practice has precedents in the theories of John Locke, William Blackstone, and Alexander Hamilton. Analysis of their writings suggests that the use of quasi-theistic language in discussions of emergency powers can have the effect of insulating “godlike” executives from the kind of scrutiny and criticism that liberalism usually promotes
Criticism · Epistemology · Faith · Law and economics · Liberalism · Miracle · Neutrality · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Prerogative · Public reason · Rhetoric · Scrutiny · Sociology · Theism · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Roman Catholicism and political form
Locke
John Locke
Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume 1
From Legitimacy to Dictatorship—and Back Again
The Dilemmas of Dictatorship
The Anatomy of Antiliberalism
God, Locke, and Equality
Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke, Peter Laslett
The Concept of the Political
Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss
The Effective Republic
Law as Politics
The anatomy of antiliberalism
Republican Empire
Political Theology
Law as Politics
Critique and crisis
Fame and the Founding Fathers
The crisis of parliamentary democracy
An essay concerning human understanding
God, Locke, and equality
American Kingship? Monarchical Origins of Modern Presidentialism
Locke on King's Prerogative
Constitutionalism and Presidential Prerogative
Can the Prince Really Be Tamed? Executive Prerogative, Popular Apathy, and the Constitutional Frame in Locke'sSecond Treatise
Was Alexander Hamilton a Christian Statesman
Alexander Hamilton and the Idea of Republican Government
Alexander Hamilton and the Idea of Republican Government
From Max Weber
The Concept of the Political
John Locke Two Treatises of Government
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,32 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2020 (14) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |