Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Can You Cut a Budget Pie

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6327313
AutoresTerry Nichols Clark (autor de correspondencia)
Año1974
Volumen3
Número2
Páginas3-32
Fecha de publicación1974-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolicy & Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0305-5736 • E-ISSN: 1470-8442
EditorialBristol University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/030557375783094590
OpenAlexW2069509081
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas22

How assess a study which shows, for example, that city police expenditures increased and fire expenditures were held constant? Or how respond to a public official who asks how better to allocate a budget? Can we systematize, at least partially, such elusive concepts as the ‘quality of life’? Consultants may comment, with varying success, from personal experience and ideology. Others may undertake cost-benefit analyses. This paper considers procedures which can bring more sophistication to traditional cost-benefit work. A first step is adequate conceptualization of public policy outputs. One basic dimension is who benefits? To answer who benefits from public policy one can analyze correspondence between a policy and the value configurations of different social sectors in the affected population. Here we define a sector as benefiting from a policy insofar as the policy is consistent with the sector’s values. Thus the greater the disparity between a policy and a sector’s values, the less the sector benefits. Sectors are defined by whatever criteria (income, political party, etc.) are significant in the social unit in question. Crucial to answering who benefits, therefore, are precise conceptualization and measurement of values. These issues we consider first

Business · Conceptualization · Dimension (graph theory · Economic growth · Economics · Ideology · Macroeconomics · Political science · Politics · Population · Public economics · Public finance · Public policy · Public sector · Sociology · Sophistication · Unit (ring theory · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Experimental evidence about deficit reduction strategies

    Open Access•Jennifer N Dineen, Jennifer Dineen et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2017

  • A dynamic method of citizen preference revelation

    Open Access•Mark D Robbins, Bill Simonsen•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2002

  • Citizens, budgets and performance measures

    Open Access•Mark D Robbins, Bill Simonsen et al.•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2009

  • Public involvement in health care priority setting

    Open Access•Penelope M Mullen•Health Expectations•1999

  • Neighborhood Evaluation of Local Government Services

    Open Access•Nicholas P Lovrich, G Thomas Taylor•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1976

  • Property Taxes and Community Political Structures

    Open Access•Jeffrey S Slovak•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1980

  • Interrelationships among public spending preferences

    Open Access•James M Ferris, JamesM Ferris•Public Choice•1985

  • The influence of fiscal information on preferences for city services

    Open Access•William Simonsen, Mark D Robbins•The Social Science Journal•2000

  • Public opinion surveys as guides to public policy and spending

    Open Access•Alfred L Birch, Alfred A Schmid•Social Indicators Research•1980

  • The needs of governments to produce services

    Open Access•Doh C Shinn, Phillip M Gregg•Social Indicators Research•1984

  • The social appropriateness of water quality management for the Lower Fraser River

    Open Access•Mark Sproule‐Jones•Canadian Public Administration•1978

  • Old and New Paradigms for Urban Research

    Open Access•Terry Nichols Clark•Urban Affairs Review•2000

  • Citizens and Resource Allocation

    Open Access•Mark D Robbins, Bill Simonsen et al.•Public Administration Review•2008

  • Subjective Indicators and Distributional Research on Public Services

    Open Access•Doh Chull Shin•Policy Studies Journal•1981

  • Why people want something for nothing

    Open Access•Soren Winter, Poul Erik Mouritzen•European Journal of Political…•2001

  • The demanding citizen

    Open Access•Poul Erik Mouritzen•European Journal of Political…•1987

  • Elections and Social Choice

    Benjamin I Page•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • Structure of Well-Being

    Open Access•R S Burt, James A Wiley et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•1978

  • Legitimation Deficit, Public Opinion and the Welfare State

    Open Access•Peter Taylor-Gooby•Sociology•1983

  • Actor Interests in a Social Topology

    Open Access•R S Burt•Sociological Inquiry•1980

  • Feelings of power in a corporate society

    Open Access•R S Burt•Social Indicators Research•1977

  • A technique for measuring preferences for spending reductions

    Open Access•Peter J May, Peter May•Social Indicators Research•1982

Obras citantes distintas22
Citas por año0,44
Intervalo de citas1976 - 2017 (42)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 22
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae