Rethinking Bureaucrats in the Policy Process

Criminal Justice Agents and the National Crime Agenda

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6327888
AutoresL L Miller (0000-0001-6165-2203, autor de correspondencia)
Año2004
Volumen32
Número4
Páginas569-588
Fecha de publicación2004-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00081.x
OpenAlexW2025331696
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas22
Referencias citadas14

Policy scholars have noted that bureaucrats can play an important role in defining policy alternatives. Few studies, however, examine the extent of their involvement in this process. This study contributes to public policy scholarship by offering a framework for understanding the strength of bureaucratic involvement in the process of defining problems and policy alternatives. Using witness data from congressional hearings on crime between 1947 and 1998, I find that federal, state, and local criminal justice bureaucrats have come to occupy a central role in the process of defining policy alternatives. In addition, I find that the centrality of criminal justice actors comes at the expense of interest groups, community organizations, and citizens/victims. Implications for criminal justice policy and understanding bureaucratic involvement in the policy process are discussed

Bureaucracy · Centrality · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Scholarship · Sociology · State (computer science · Witness · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research