Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Who Deserves Scarce Health and Education Resources? How Policy Context Shapes Target Group Deservingness

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6328645
AutoresElizabeth Bell (0000-0003-1021-9287, The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA, autor de correspondencia), Monica C Schneider (0000-0002-6948-4520, Miami University Oxford Ohio USA), Dara Z Strolovitch (0000-0002-1051-8036, Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA), Ari Ne''Eman, Ari Ne'Eman (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA)
Año2025
Fecha de publicación2025-12-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/psj.70088
OpenAlexW4416943336
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas106

The social construction of target populations (SCTP) framework emphasizes the ways in which target populations' levels of political power and deservingness shape the allocation of policy benefits, but less attention has been devoted to the conditions under which the same target population may be considered deserving in one policy context but undeserving in another. We argue that perceived deservingness and distributions of policy benefits to dependent groups are conditional on two components of policy context: (1) resource scarcity and (2) policy domain. We test our hypotheses in two nationally representative conjoint experiments during the COVID‐19 pandemic, focusing on people with disabilities (PWD), a significant and understudied marginalized group. We find that while respondents prioritized PWD when providing educational resources, they deprioritized PWD when allocating life‐saving medical resources. We also find that emotions toward PWD were important correlates of public preferences for allocating policy benefits. Together, our findings highlight the importance of resource scarcity, policy domain, and emotions in shaping deservingness perceptions and the allocation of scarce resources

  • The emotion–valuation constellation

    Open Access•D Sznycer, Aaron W Lukaszewski•Evolution and Human Behavior•2019

  • Why Americans Hate Welfare

    Martin Gilens•Why Americans hate welfare•1999

  • The Submerged State

    Suzanne Mettler•Submerged State•2011

  • The Capacity Contract

    Stacy Clifford Simplican•The Capacity Contract•2015

  • Dangerous Frames

    Nicholas J G Winter•Dangerous Frames•2008

  • Evolutionary Psychology

    Leda Cosmides, John Tooby•Annual Review of Psychology•2013

  • Physicians’ Perceptions Of People With Disability And Their Health Care

    Lisa I Iezzoni, Sowmya R Rao et al.•Health Affairs•2021

  • Reasoning and Choice

    Open Access•Paul M Sniderman, Richard A Brody et al.•Reasoning and Choice•1991

  • The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare

    Wim Van Oorschot, Femke Roosma et al.•Social Legitimacy of Targeted…•2017

  • Considerations for educators in supporting student learning in the midst of Covid‐19

    Open Access•Marlena L Minkos, Nicholas Gelbar•Psychology in the Schools•2021

  • The stereotype content model and disabilities

    Emily Canton, Darren Hedley et al.•The Journal of Social Psychology•2023

  • Preferences for redistribution are sensitive to perceived luck, social homogeneity, war and scarcity

    Open Access•D Nettle, Rebecca Saxe•Cognition•2020

  • Bioethics, Adaptive Preferences, and Judging the Quality of a Life with Disability

    Joseph A Stramondo•Social Theory and Practice•2021

  • Disciplining the Poor

    Joe So, Joe Soss et al.•Disciplining the Poor•2011

  • Anxious Politics

    Open Access•Bethany Albertson, Shana Kushner Gadarian•Anxious Politics•2015

  • Dehumanization of mental illness and the stereotype content model

    Guy A Boysen, Rebecca L Chicosky et al.•Stigma and Health•2020

  • Playing Favorites

    Dara Z Strolovitch•NWSA Journal•1998

  • Social Construction and Policy Design

    Open Access•Jonathan J Pierce, Saba Siddiki et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2014

  • Analysing emotional discourse among allies and opponents in the news media

    Allegra H Fullerton, Kayla M Gabehart et al.•Emotions and Society•2023

  • Moderator Placement in Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Bethany Albertson, Steve Jessee•Journal of Experimental Political…•2022

  • Public support for the social rights and social obligations of the unemployed

    Open Access•Tijs Laenen, Bart Meuleman•International Journal of Social…•2018

  • Dehumanization, prejudice, and social policy beliefs concerning people with developmental disabilities

    Open Access•Laura R Parker, Margo J Monteith et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2018

  • Exploring emotional discourses

    Jill Yordy, Anna Durnová et al.•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2023

  • Disability Rights Approach Toward Bioethics

    Open Access•G Wolbring•Journal of Disability Policy…•2003

  • Eugenics and Disability Discrimination

    David Pfeiffer•Disability & Society•1994

  • Resistance or Capitulation? How Discrete Emotions Shape Citizens’ Interactions With the Administrative State

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, Julian Christensen et al.•The American Review of Public…•2022

  • The unequal distribution of administrative burden

    Open Access•Mariana Chudnovsky, Rik Peeters•Social Policy and Administration•2021

  • Stigmatizing attributions about mental illness

    Open Access•Patrick W Corrigan, L Philip River et al.•Journal of Community Psychology•2000

  • Health in citizen‐state interactions

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, Julian Christensen et al.•Public Administration Review•2022

  • How Did Colleges Disburse Emergency Aid During Covid-19? An Implementation Analysis of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, David J Schwegman et al.•Educational Researcher•2023

  • The Politics of Designing Tuition-Free College

    Elizabeth Bell•The Journal of Higher Education•2020

  • Economic scarcity increases racial stereotyping in beliefs and face representation

    Open Access•Michael Berkebile-Weinberg, Michael M Berkebile-Weinberg et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022

  • Covid-19 and ageism

    Caitlin Monahan, Jamie Macdonald et al.•American Psychologist•2020

  • The Anger Gap

    Open Access•Davin L Phoenix•Anger Gap•2019

  • Studying Identities with Experiments

    Open Access•Samara Klar, Thomas J Leeper et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2019

  • Fifty shades of deservingness

    Open Access•Rebecca J Kreitzer, Elizabeth Maltby et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2022

  • How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It

    Open Access•Jacob M Montgomery, Brendan Nyhan et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • When Effect Becomes Cause

    Open Access•Paul Pierson•World Politics•1993

  • The Polls

    Robert Y Shapiro, John Young et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986

  • Just or Unjust? How Ideological Beliefs Shape Street‐Level Bureaucrats’ Perceptions of Administrative Burden

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, Ani Ter‐mkrtchyan et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Patterns of Change in the Use of Imprisonment in the American States

    Open Access•Anne L Schneider•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments

    Open Access•Thomas J Leeper, Sara B Hobolt et al.•Political Analysis•2020

  • Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, D J Hopkins et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias

    Open Access•Yusaku Horiuchi, Zachary Markovich et al.•Political Analysis•2022

  • Social Constructions, Anticipatory Feedback Strategies, and Deceptive Public Policy

    Open Access•Anne L Schneider, Herbert Ingram et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2019

  • The Effects of Beneficiary Targeting on Public Support for Social Policies

    Open Access•Eric Lawrence, Robert P Stoker et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2013

  • Policy Feedback in a Racialized Polity

    Open Access•James Michener•Policy Studies Journal•2019

  • Taking perspective of the stories we tell about transgender rights

    Open Access•Andrew Flores, Daniel Boden et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2023

  • Deserving to Whom? Investigating Heterogeneity in the Impact of Social Constructions of Target Populations on Support for Affirmative Action

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell•Policy Studies Journal•2021

  • How racialized policy contact shapes the social constructions of policy targets

    Open Access•Elizabeth Maltby, Rebecca J Kreitzer•Policy Studies Journal•2023

  • Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public

    Wim Van Oorschot•Policy & Politics•2000

  • Emotions and the policy process

    Jonathan J Pierce•Policy & Politics•2021

  • Integrating identity in policy design theory

    Elizabeth Bell, Edith Lui•Policy & Politics•2023

  • Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test

    Sebastian Jilke, Lidewij Tummers et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2018

  • Racialized Burdens

    Open Access•Ray, Victor Ray et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2023

  • Does administrative burden create racialized policy feedback? How losing access to public benefits impacts beliefs about government

    Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, James E Wright et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2024

  • Why Do Policymakers Support Administrative Burdens? The Roles of Deservingness, Political Ideology, and Personal Experience

    Open Access•Martin Baekgaard, Donald P Moynihan et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2021

  • On the Political Consequences of Scarcity and Economic Decline

    Ted Robert Gurr•International Studies Quarterly•1985

  • The New Racism

    Paul M Sniderman, Thomas Piazza et al.•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care

    Open Access•Carsten Jensen, Michael Bang Petersen•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Race and recession

    Amy R Krosch, T R Tyler et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2017

  • Reproducible and Replicable

    Open Access•Rebecca J Kreitzer, Candis Watts Smith•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Managing Ambivalent Prejudices

    Open Access•Susan T Fiske•The Annals of the American…•2012

  • The Social Construction of Target Populations and the Transformation of Prison-Based Aids Policy

    Nancy L Hogan•Journal of Homosexuality•1997

  • Social Construction of Target Populations

    Open Access•Anne L Schneider, Anne Schneider et al.•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Targeted for Diffusion? How the Use and Acceptance of Stereotypes Shape the Diffusion of Criminal Justice Policy Innovations in the American States

    Open Access•Graeme Boushey•American Political Science Review•2016

  • Political Science Theory and Disability

    Sara E Kimberlin, Sara Kimberlin•Journal of Human Behavior in the…•2009

  • Welfare deservingness opinions from heuristic to measurable concept

    Open Access•Bart Meuleman, Femke Roosma et al.•Social Science Research•2020

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae