Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Does Private School Competition H-arm Public Schools? Revisiting Smith and Meier's

The Case Against School Choice

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6340957
AutoresRobert Maranto (0000-0001-6796-3627, University of Virginia), Scott Milliman (0000-0003-0606-389X), Scott Stevens (0000-0002-2549-1489, James Madison University), Scott P Stevens (0000-0003-4691-4599, James Madison University)
Año2000
Volumen53
Número1
Páginas177-192
Fecha de publicación2000-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/106591290005300109
OpenAlexW2027673983
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas9

Smith and Meier (1995a) empirically assess the market hypothesis advanced by Chubb and Moe (1988, 1990), which holds that compettion improves schools. Using Florida school district data, Smith and Meier find that higher private school market share lowers public school test scores; they conclude that competition harms public schools. Hoever, they do not take into account the impact of family income on copetition in traditionally organized education markets: the lower the income, the less likely parents can exit the public schools, which implies less competition. Using their database but segmenting it into low and high income groups, we reanalyze the relationship between test scores and private school market share. We find that private school market share lowers test scores primarily in low income districts, where comptition is least due to low family income. We conclude that Smith and Meier's rejection of the market hypothesis is premature

Competition (biology · Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economics · Higher education · Market economy · Market share · Private education · Private school · School choice · Test (biology · Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · School Choice and Performance · Finance

  • Understanding Charter School Leaders’ Perceptions of Competition in Arizona

    Open Access•Benjamin Creed, Huriya Jabbar et al.•Educational Administration…•2021

  • Mapping Educational Inequality

    Salvatore Saporito, Saporito et al.•Social Forces•2007

  • The role of aggregation in estimating the effects of private school competition on student achievement

    Open Access•Christopher Jepsen•Journal of Urban Economics•2002

  • Choice, Competition, and Cognition

    Huriya Jabbar, Benjamin Creed•Peabody Journal of Education•2020

  • Money Only Matters if You Want It To? Exposing the Normative Implications of Empirical Research

    Katherine B Smith, Kevin B Smith et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Data Don't Matter? Academic Research and School Choice

    Katherine B Smith, Kevin Smith•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • Politics, markets, and America's schools

    John E Chubb•Politics, markets, and America's…•1990

  • Catholic Schools and the Common Good

    Open Access•Anthony S Bryk, Valerie E Lee et al.•Catholic Schools and the Common…•1993

  • Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?

    Caroline M Hoxby, Caroline Hoxby•American Economic Review•2000

  • Public Choice in Education

    Open Access•Katherine B Smith, Kevin B Smith et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Politics, Markets, and the Organization of Schools

    Open Access•John E Chubb, Terry M Moe•American Political Science Review•1988

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2002 - 2021 (20)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae