Respondent Screening and Revealed Preference Axioms
Testing Quarantining Methods for Enhanced Data Quality in Web Panel Surveys
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6367172 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael S Jones (0000-0002-2068-5428), Lisa House (0000-0002-1901-6550), Lisa A House, Zhifeng Gao (0000-0003-2984-8278) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Volumen | 79 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 687-709 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Opinion Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0033-362X • E-ISSN: 1537-5331 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/poq/nfv015 |
| OpenAlex | W2262445034 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 20 |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
Journal Article Respondent Screening and Revealed Preference Axioms: Testing Quarantining Methods for Enhanced Data Quality in Web Panel Surveys Get access Michael S. Jones, Michael S. Jones * Michael S. Jones is a doctoral student in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Lisa A. House is a professor in the Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Zhifeng Gao is an associate professor in the Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. The authors would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and declare no conflicts of interest. This work was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA, [Grant #2009-55618-05077 to L.A.H.]. *Address correspondence to Michael S. Jones, 3311 Nelson Hall, CB# 8110, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-8110, USA; e-mail: [email protected]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Lisa A. House, Lisa A. House Michael S. Jones is a doctoral student in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Lisa A. House is a professor in the Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Zhifeng Gao is an associate professor in the Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. The authors would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and declare no conflicts of interest. This work was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA, [Grant #2009-55618-05077 to L.A.H.]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Zhifeng Gao Zhifeng Gao Michael S. Jones is a doctoral student in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Lisa A. House is a professor in the Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Zhifeng Gao is an associate professor in the Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. The authors would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and declare no conflicts of interest. This work was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA, [Grant #2009-55618-05077 to L.A.H.]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 79, Issue 3, Fall 2015, Pages 687–709, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv015 Published: 02 June 2015
Agricultural experiment station · Agriculture · Archaeology · Geography · Library science · Political science · Resource (disambiguation · Respondent · Sociology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Law
Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media
Representative Sampling of the Via Assessment Suite for Adults
Lie for a Dime
How to alleviate alienation from the perspective of urban community public space—Evidence from urban young residents in China
Racial Differences in Perceived Food Swamp and Food Desert Exposure and Disparities in Self-Reported Dietary Habits
Consequences of Participant Inattention with an Application to Carbon Taxes for Meat Products
The impact of respondent attentiveness on reliability and validity
Data quality comparison between computers and smartphones in different web survey modes and question formats
The value of online surveys
How do consumers respond to labels for crispr (gene-editing)
Effect of government quality grade labels on consumer demand for pork chops in the short and long run
Habit spillovers or induced awareness
Impact of satisficing behavior in online surveys on consumer preference and welfare estimates
The influence of multicultural experience on attitudes towards new foods in the U.S
An exploration of the motivations and barriers to being a foster parent in Florida
Using Instructed Response Items as Attention Checks in Web Surveys
The Issue of Noncompliance in Attention Check Questions
The Influence of Covid-19 on Women's Perceptions of Work-Family Conflict in Singapore
Suspicious and fraudulent online survey participation
Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
Giving According to Garp
Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks
Models of man, social and rational
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
Using discrete choice experiments to derive welfare estimates for the provision of elective surgery
Revealed Preference and the Utility Function
A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour
Research Synthesis
Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized QuestionnairesAn Experiment
Culture, gender, and self
Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement
| Obras citantes distintas | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 20 |