Community Benefits Through an Anchor
Contestations During the Planning of the Obama Presidential Center
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6404450 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Maura Fennelly (0000-0003-2631-6006, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 60 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 1024-1061 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Urban Affairs Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10780874231212897 |
| OpenAlex | W4388732780 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 42 |
With the privatization of urban development, anchor institutions are becoming stakeholders in neighborhood revitalization. Cities are eager for anchors due to their purported benefits, but residents are often wary of negative externalities and push for more accountability. This study uses new urban regime theory and focuses on the contestations during an anchor's planning and analyzes the significance of the contestations’ associated outcomes. I use the case of the Obama Presidential Center and the Obama Foundation's rejection of a community benefits agreement to show how anchors can promote a community vision that supersedes that of residents and local organizations. Interviews with organizational stakeholders and analysis of planning materials reveal competing positions regarding organizational identity, community definitions, and racial legitimacy. Enforcing accountability with anchors will require city governments to critique meanings of neighborhood revitalization, prioritize local voices and consider impacts for all large developments, irrespective of whether they are for-profit or non-profit
Accountability · Economics · Externality · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Public relations · Sociology · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Urban Planning and Governance · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Root Shock
Neighborhood Defenders
Community Benefits Agreements and Local Government
Nonprofit Neighborhoods
Knocking the Hustle
The unstudied reference neighborhood
How Low–Income Residents Can Benefit from Urban Development
Broken Windows as Growth Machines
The Missing Organizational Dimension in Urban Sociology
Negotiating With the Growth Machine
Empowering Communities through Deliberation The Model of Community Benefits Agreements
Schools and Urban Revitalization
Two sides of the same coin
The Politics of Eminent Domain
William Worthy’s Concept of “Institutional Rape” Revisited
The Post-1965 Trajectory of Race, Class, and Urban Politics in the United States Reconsidered
Making the Second Ghetto
New Urban Regimes in Baltimore
The L.A. Live Community Benefits Agreement
Neighborhood Revitalization and the Anchor Institution
Working-Class Institutions, Amazon and The Politics of Local Economic Development in Western Queens
Reflections on Regime Politics
Whose Politics? Reflections on Clarence Stone’s Regime Politics
Making Life Work in Crowded Places
Privatizing the Welfare State
The Privatization of Political Representation
From Whiteness to Colorblindness in Public Policies
Urban Fortunes
How many cases do I need
Using Interviews to Understand Why
Community Organizations in the Foreclosure Crisis
Capitalizing on Community
The Radiant University
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |