Science in Policy-Making
Neutral Experts or Strategic Policy-Makers
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6407273 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Karin Ingold (0000-0001-8166-1780, University of Bern), Muriel Gschwend, Muriel Luzia Gschwend (University of Bern) |
| Año | 2014 |
| Volumen | 37 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 993-1018 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2014-09-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | West European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402382.2014.920983 |
| OpenAlex | W1983745786 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 40 |
| Referencias citadas | 61 |
Although many policy process and diffusion theories follow the premise that scientific and technological knowledge plays a crucial role in a wide variety of policy fields, very few empirically assess the impact that institutional and process-relevant factors may have on the position of science within a process. The present study addresses the question of what role science plays in policy processes. To answer this, we apply the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) and investigate three complementary assumptions using a qualitative comparison of four cases: the ACF claims that scientific experts can take very different positions in the policy process, depending on how conflictive or consensus-oriented the relations among actors and coalitions are within a so-called policy subsystem. Put differently, the type of subsystem impacts on the position of science within the process. The results show that subsystem-specific factors impact upon whether scientific representatives act at the periphery of a process or as policy brokers seeking feasible policy solutions
Business · Economics · Epistemology · Management science · Political science · Position (finance · Positive economics · Premise · Process (computing · Public relations · Science policy · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Technology policy · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities across Europe
Engagement without accountability
Salient and contested scientific evidence in debates over sustainable transformation
The Role of Science in the Policy Subsystem
How do regulatory agencies justify their investments in regulatory science and innovation? An examination of FDA's congressional budget justifications
Seeing the same evidence differently
Investigating ACF Policy Change Theory in a Unitary Policy Subsystem
The more the merrier? Actors and ideas in the evolution of German hydrogen policy discourse
Comparing Discourse and Policy Network Approaches
Forests in the Spotlight
Not a Security Issue
Examining experts' discourse in South Korea's nuclear power policy making
Policy Innovation in Barcelona and Utrecht
Scientists, Knowledge, and Coalitions
Policy learning, motivated scepticism, and the politics of shale gas development in British Columbia and Quebec
A Comparative Analysis of Expert Advisors’ Role Perceptions in Policymaking
Introduction to the special issue on “The role of experts in developing social policies
The role of experts in forming family policy under an adversarial subsystem in the Czech Republic
Experts as researchers and policy actors
Narrative strategies in the policy process
Artificial Intelligence and the Algorithmic Discursive Sphere
Information exchange under uncertainty
Barriers to evidence use for sustainability
Trust, but verify? Understanding citizen attitudes toward evidence‐informed policy making
Global perspectives on scientists’ roles in legislative policymaking
Evaluation use and learning in public policy
Transdisciplinarity
The Advocacy Coalition Index
Ethical Problems and the Role of Expertise in Health Policy
Theorizing the functions and patterns of agency in the policymaking process
The active participation in a community transformation project in China
Populists dealing with experts and policy legacies
How Patterns of Democracy Impact Policy Processes
Expert authority and support for Covid-19 measures in Germany and the UK
Blame avoidance in hard times
The Roles of Experts and Expert‐Based Information in the Advocacy Coalition Framework
There and Back Again
Freezing deliberation through public expert advice
Can policy actors learn from academic scientists
Ciência E Processo Decisório
Comparing Policy Networks
Public Policy
Theories of the Policy Process
The Advocacy Coalition Framework
Policy change and learning
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
The neglected heart of science policy
Harnessing expert-based information for learning and the sustainable management of complex socio-ecological systems
The production and use of knowledge in regulatory impact assessment – An empirical analysis
Pro-active Evaluators
An Alternate Route to Policy Influence
Creating usable science
Drivers of collaboration to mitigate climate change
Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis
How involved are they really? A comparative network analysis of the institutional drivers of local actor inclusion
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein
Policy making and collective action
Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making
Is politics power or policy oriented? A comparative analysis of dynamic access models in policy networks
Themes and Variations
Accountability and Multi-level Governance
Types of knowledge utilization of regulatory impact assessments
Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict
Advocacy Coalitions Along the Domestic‐Foreign Frontier
Ideology, Power, and the Structure of Policy Networks
Comparing Policy Networks
Scientific Credibility, Disagreement, and Error Costs in 17 Biotechnology Policy Subsystems
Bureaucratic Competition in the Policy Process
Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework
Shared Beliefs and Imposed Interdependencies as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems
Treating Policy Brokers Seriously
Politics versus Professionalism
Diffusion without convergence
Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework
Diplomacy and domestic politics
Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming
New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies
The Institutional Arrangements for Connecting Evidence and Policy
Is Implementation Distinct from Political Bargaining
Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making
A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework
Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance
| Obras citantes distintas | 40 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 3,64 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 40 |