Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6409844 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dana Patton (0000-0001-9098-9665, University of Alabama, autor de correspondencia), Joseph L Smith (0000-0001-7738-2631, University of Alabama) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 393-415 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Women & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1554477x.2020.1738977 |
| OpenAlex | W3017914522 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
| Referencias citadas | 46 |
Gender bias in political discourse has been demonstrated in many settings, including the US Supreme Court. We investigate the effects of ideology and gender in verbal interactions during Supreme Court oral arguments. We theorize that all justices possess unconscious gender schemas that lead them to speak more during presentations by women but that liberal and female justices likely have conscious egalitarian values that diminish the manifestation of gender schemas. We find that conservative justices speak more when female lawyers are arguing but that liberal justices show no such effect, suggesting that consciously held attitudes can mitigate the expression of unconscious gender schemas
Dominance (genetics · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Supreme court · Unconscious mind · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Psychology · Social Psychology
Conflict, gender, and amount of talk
Since you put it that way… Gender norms and interruptions at Supreme Court oral arguments
Institutional Design and the Predictability of Judicial Interruptions at Oral Argument
Let Me Just Interrupt You”
A Fresh Perspective
I Can’t See You; Can You Hear Me? Gender Norms and Context During In-Person and Teleconference U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
The Attorneys’ Gender
The Role of Judge Gender and Ideology in Hiring Female Law Clerks
You Think; Therefore I Am
Well said
How Power Affects People
Have We Come a Long Way, Baby? The Influence of Attorney Gender on Supreme Court Decision Making
Dominance as Expressed and Inferred Through Speaking Time
The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice
New Research on Gendered Political Institutions
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation
Lawyer, Interrupted
Lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court
Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures
Case Salience and Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decisions
Gender Stereotypes, Same-Gender Preferences, and Organizational Variation in the Hiring of Women
The Proximate Causes of Employment Discrimination
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court
Gender and Power in American Legislative Discourse
Repeat Players in the Supreme Court
Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench
Change and Continuity among Women State Legislators
Representative Decision Making on the Federal Bench
Toward an Actor-Based Measure of Supreme Court Case Salience
The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters
Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court
Gender Inequality in Deliberation
Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues
Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test
Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice
Imagining stereotypes away
Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change
On the malleability of automatic attitudes
Information, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making
Matching with Multiple Controls to Estimate Treatment Effects in Observational Studies
Who women are, who women should be
The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators
Gender Discrimination at Work
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |